avgust 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0151_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 October 2020.#Slim Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Ali v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Tunisia – Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to adjudicate within a reasonable time – Sufficient factual basis – Time limits for bringing proceedings – Legal aid – Suspensive effect – Admissibility – Conditions.#Case T-151/18.
avgust 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0161_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 24 February 2021.#Anthony Braesch and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Aid for the precautionary restructuring of Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena – Preliminary examination stage – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Plea of inadmissibility – Status as an interested party – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Admissibility.#Case T-161/18.
avgust 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0163_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020 (Extracts).#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Continued inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation on the Council to disclose new evidence justifying the renewal of restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Presumption of innocence — Plea of illegality.#Case T-163/18.
avgust 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0170_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2020 (Extracts).#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — Freezing of funds — Continued inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list of persons covered — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Obligation on the Council to disclose new evidence justifying the renewal of restrictive measures — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private and family life — Proportionality — Presumption of innocence — Plea of illegality — Modification of the form of order sought.#Case T-170/18.
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0192_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.#Rietze GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Registered Community design representing the motor vehicle VW Caddy – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Informed user – Different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Burden of proof on the applicant for a declaration of invalidity – Requirements relating to the reproduction of an earlier design.#Case T-192/18.
avgust 23, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0203_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 July 2020.#VQ v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Administrative pecuniary penalty imposed by the ECB on a credit institution for infringement of Article 77(a) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Rules for publication on the ECB’s website — Article 18(6) of Regulation No 1024/2013 and Article 132(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014.#Case T-203/18.
avgust 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0207_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 December 2020 (Extracts).#PlasticsEurope v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Establishment of a list of substances identified with a view to their eventual inclusion in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Supplement to the entry relating to the substance bisphenol A on that list – Articles 57 and 59 of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Manifest error of assessment – Weight of evidence approach – Exploratory studies – Intermediate uses – Proportionality.#Case T-207/18.
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0209_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 June 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a motor vehicle – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-209/18.
avgust 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0211_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Vanda Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use — Application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Fanaptum — iloperidone — Commission refusal decision — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 — Scientific evaluation of the risks and benefits of a medicinal product — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality — Equal treatment.#Case T-211/18.
april 30, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62018TJ0218(01): Arrêt du Tribunal (dixième chambre) du 30 avril 2025.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Aides d’État – Secteur aérien – Aide au fonctionnement accordée par l’Allemagne à l’aéroport de Francfort-Hahn – Subvention directe visant à couvrir les pertes d’exploitation attendues de l’aéroport sur la période 2017-2021 – Décision de ne pas soulever d’objections – Recours ne tendant pas à assurer la sauvegarde des droits procéduraux – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-218/18 RENV. This document does not exist in English.