september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0733_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 May 2019 (Extracts).#GMP-Orphan (GMPO) v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Article 3(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Definition of ‘significant benefit’ – Availability of orphan medicinal products – Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation No 141/2000 – Commission decision to remove a medicinal product from the Register of Orphan Medicinal Products – Error of assessment – Error of law – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-733/17.
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0737_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 April 2019.#Francis Wattiau v European Parliament.#Civil service — Social security — JSIS — Reimbursement of medical expenses — Agreement concluded, in particular, between the European Union, Luxembourg and the Entente des hôpitaux luxembourgeois on the scales of fees for hospital care received by JSIS members — Plea of illegality — Principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality — First paragraph of Article 18 TFEU — Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Article 39 of the Joint Rules on sickness insurance for officials.#Case T-737/17.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0738_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 July 2019.#Syndicat Transport Ile de France (STIF-IDF) v European Commission.#State aid — Aid scheme unlawfully implemented by France between 1994 and 2008 — Investment subsidies awarded by STIF-IDF — Decision declaring the aid scheme compatible with the internal market — Advantage — Compensation for the costs involved in the performance of public service obligations — Article 107(1) TFUE — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-738/17.
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0741_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2019.#Trasys International EEIG and Axianseu - Digital Solutions SA v European Aviation Safety Agency.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – IT application and infrastructure management services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers – Obligation to state reasons – Assessment of the existence of abnormally low tenders – Characteristics and relative merits of the tenders accepted – Request for a statement of reasons made by a tenderer who is not in an exclusion situation and whose tender is compliant with the procurement documents.#Case T-741/17.
avgust 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0745_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2020.#Kerkosand spol. s r. o. v European Commission.#State aid – Aid for an investment project in western Slovakia – Regional investment aid – Dismissal of a complaint – Decision not to raise any objections – Conditions for exemption – Article 14 of Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Scope of the Commission’s supervisory power – Guidelines on regional State aid for 2014-2020 – Concept of SME – Article 3(2) and (3) of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 – Data used for the staff headcount and the financial amounts and reference period – Article 4 of Annex I to Regulation No 651/2014 – Doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market – Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Serious difficultie
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0747_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2019.#Union des Ports de France - UPF v European Commission.#State aid – Corporate tax exemption scheme implemented by France in favour of its ports – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market – Existing aid – Concept of economic activity – Obligation to state reasons – Distortions of competition and effect on trade between Member States – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-747/17.
september 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0751_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Commune de Fessenheim and Others v European Commission.#Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Letter sent by the Commission to the French authorities regarding the protocol for the compensation of the EDF Group in respect of the repeal of the permit to operate the Fessenheim Nuclear Power Plant — Refusal of access — Exception relating to the protection of the commercial interests of a third party — Exception relating to the protection of the purpose of inspections, investigations and audits — General presumption of confidentiality — Overriding public interest.#Case T-751/17.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0755_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 September 2019.#Federal Republic of Germany v European Chemicals Agency.#REACH – Evaluation of substances – Benpat – Persistence – ECHA decision requesting further information – Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Action brought before the Board of Appeal – Task of the Board of Appeal – Adversarial procedure – Nature of review – Intensity of review – Powers of the Board of Appeal – Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 – Conferral of powers on EU agencies – Principle of conferral – Principle of subsidiarity – Proportionality – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-755/17.
avgust 29, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0778_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 October 2019 (Extracts).#Autostrada Wielkopolska S.A. v European Commission.#State aid – Toll-motorway concession – Law providing for an exemption from tolls for certain vehicles – Compensation granted to the concession holder by the Member State for loss of revenue – Shadow tolls – Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Commission’s obligation to exercise particular vigilance – Concept of State aid – Advantage – Improvement of the concessionaire’s expected financial situation – Criterion of the private operator in a market economy – Article 107(3)(a) TFEU – Regional State aid.#Case T-778/17.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62017TJ0783_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 September 2019.#GE Healthcare A/S v European Commission.#Medicinal products for human use – Suspension of the marketing authorisation for gadolinium-containing contrast agents – Articles 31 and 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Impartiality).#Case T-783/17.