Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62016TJ0300_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 April 2019.#Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission.#Subsidies — Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/387 — Imposition of a definitive countervailing duty — Indian scheme establishing an export tax on iron ore and a dual railway freight charge placing the transport of iron ore for export at a disadvantage — Article 3(1)(a)(iv) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 (replaced by Regulation (EU) 2016/1037) — Financial contribution — Provision of goods — Action consisting of ‘entrusting’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution — Article 4(2)(a) of Regulation No 597/2009 — Specifi

0 0

CELEX:62016TJ0301_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 April 2019.#Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission.#Dumping — Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India — Implementing regulation (EU) 2016/388 — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (replaced by Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Dumping margin — Determination of the export price — Association between exporter and importer — Reliable export price — Construction of the export price — Reasonable margin for selling, general and administrative costs — Reasonable margin for profit — Injury to the Union industry — Calculation of price undercutting and the injury margin — Causal link — Access to confidential data of the anti-dumping investigation — Rights of the d

0 0

CELEX:62016TJ0303_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (neuvième chambre) du 26 janvier 2022.#Mylan IRE Healthcare Ltd contre Commission européenne.#Médicaments à usage humain – Médicaments orphelins – Autorisations de mise sur le marché des médicaments Tobramycin VVB et dénominations associées – Dérogation à l’exclusivité commerciale du Tobi Podhaler, contenant la substance active tobramycine – Article 8, paragraphe 3, sous c), du règlement (CE) no 141/2000 – Notion de “bénéfice notable” – Notion de “supériorité clinique” – Article 3, paragraphe 2, et paragraphe 3, sous d), du règlement (CE) no 847/2000 – Devoir de diligence – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation.#Affaire T-303/16.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62016TJ0310_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 March 2019.#Foshan Lihua Ceramic Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping — Imports of ceramic tiles originating in China — Article 11(4) and (5) and Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 11(4) and (5) and Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Refusal to grant new exporting producer treatment in accordance with Article 3 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 — Sampling — Individual examination — Confidentiality.#Case T-310/16.

0 0

CELEX:62016TJ0323_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 November 2019.#Banco Cooperativo Español, SA v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on the 2016 ex ante contributions – Action for annulment – Direct and individual concern – Admissibility – Essential procedural requirements – Authentication of the decision – Procedure for adoption of the decision.#Case T-323/16.

0 0

CELEX:62016TJ0365_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 November 2019.#Portigon AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) — Decision of the SRB on 2016 ex-ante contributions – Action for annulment – Direct and individual concern – Admissibility – Essential procedural requirements – Authentication of the decision – Procedure for the adoption of the decision – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-365/16.

0 0

CELEX:62016TJ0377_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 November 2019.#Hypo Vorarlberg Bank AG, foremerly Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG v Single Resolution Board.#Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Single resolution mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Single Resolution Fund (SRF) – Decision of the SRB on 2016 ex ante contributions – Action for annulment – Direct and individual concern – Admissibility – Essential procedural requirements – Authentication of the decision – Procedure for the adoption of the decision – Obligation to state reasons – Limitation in time of the effects of the judgment.#Joined Cases T-377/16, T-645/16 and T-809/16.

0 0

CELEX:62016TJ0399_RES: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 May 2020.#CK Telecoms UK Investments Ltd v European Commission.#Competition — Concentrations — Wireless telecommunications — Retail market for mobile telecommunication services — Market for wholesale access and call origination on public mobile networks — Acquisition of Telefónica Europe by Hutchison — Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market — Oligopolistic market — Significant impediment to effective competition — Non-coordinated effects — Burden of proof — Standard of proof — Market shares — Effects of the merger on prices — Quantitative analysis of upward pricing pressure — Close competitors — Important competitive constraint — Important competitive force —

RSS
First597598599600602604605606Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top