februar 14, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62016TB0522: Case T-522/16: Order of the General Court of 29 November 2021 — Nguyen v Council (Civil service — Contract staff — 2014 Reform of the Staff Regulations — Reimbursement of annual travel expenses and grant of travelling time — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
februar 14, 2022 0 28 CELEX:62016TB0524(01): Case T-524/16: Order of the General Court of 29 November 2021 — Aresu v Commission (Civil service — Officials — 2014 Reform of the Staff Regulations — Travelling time — Home leave — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
februar 20, 2023 0 32 CELEX:62016TB0735: Case T-735/16: Order of the General Court of 6 December 2022 — CX v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal from post — Decision to reduce the remuneration of the applicant — No need to adjudicate)
januar 30, 2023 0 97 CELEX:62016TB0782: Case T-782/16: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Timberland Europe v Commission
februar 06, 2023 0 98 CELEX:62016TB0790: Cases T-790/16 and T-861/16: Order of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — C & J Clark International v Commission
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62016TJ0001_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 July 2019 (Extracts).#Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. and Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc. v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for optical disk drives — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Collusive agreements relating to procurement events organised by two computer manufacturers — Unlimited jurisdiction — Infringement of the principle of good administration — Obligation to state reasons — Point 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Particular circumstances — Error of law.#Case T-1/16.
avgust 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62016TJ0008_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 July 2019 (Extracts).#Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp. and Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp. v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for optical disk drives — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Collusive agreements relating to procurement events organised by two computer manufacturers — Breach of essential procedural requirements and of the rights of the defence — Jurisdiction of the Commission — Geographic scope of the infringement — Single and continuous infringement — Principle of good administration — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines.#Case T-8/16.
september 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62016TJ0098_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 March 2019.#Italian Republic and Others v European Commission.#State aid — Measures adopted by a consortium of banks governed by private law for the benefit of one of its members — Measures authorised by the Central Bank of the Member State — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Definition of State aid — Whether imputable to the State — State resources.#Joined Cases T-98/16, T-196/16 and T-198/16.
september 20, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62016TJ0131(01): Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2023.#Kingdom of Belgium v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme put into effect by Belgium – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted – Tax ruling – Taxable profit – Excess profit exemption – Advantage – Selectivity – Adverse effect on competition – Recovery.#Case T-131/16 RENV.
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62016TJ0131(01)_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 September 2023.#Kingdom of Belgium v European Commission.#State aid – Aid scheme put into effect by Belgium – Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid granted – Tax ruling – Taxable profit – Excess profit exemption – Advantage – Selectivity – Adverse effect on competition – Recovery.#Case T-131/16 RENV.