oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0219_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Ministère public v KN.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Montpellier.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Article 67(3) and Article 82(1) TFEU – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Extradition request from a third country – EU citizen – Articles 18 and 21 TFEU – Previous decision of another Member State refusing extradition due to a serious risk of infringement of fundamental rights – Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right of the requested person not to be extradited to a State where there is a serious risk that he or she would be subjected to torture or inhuman o
september 18, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0223: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#BT and CY v Finanzamt Siegburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Income tax – Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the free movement of persons – Equal treatment – Nationality – Residence – Tax advantages – Deductibility of certain expenses incurred by the taxpayer in relation to his or her household – Restriction to expenditure relating to households situated in a Member State or in a State party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Justification.#Case C-223/25.
september 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0223_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 September 2026.#BT and CY v Finanzamt Siegburg.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Income tax – Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the free movement of persons – Equal treatment – Nationality – Residence – Tax advantages – Deductibility of certain expenses incurred by the taxpayer in relation to his or her household – Restriction to expenditure relating to households situated in a Member State or in a State party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Justification.#Case C-223/25.
oktober 09, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0224: Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 8 octobre 2026.#La Maison de l'Union syndicale contre Conseil de l'Union européenne.#Pourvoi – Droit institutionnel – Fonction publique – Recours en annulation – Personnes physiques ou morales – Actes les concernant directement et individuellement – Protocole signé par une institution de l’Union européenne et une organisation syndicale – Violation dudit protocole par l’institution – Recours de l’organisation syndicale en cas de désistement du fonctionnaire concerné par la violation – Recevabilité – Article 263, quatrième alinéa, TFUE – Qualité pour agir – Droit à une protection juridictionnelle effective – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne.#Affaire C-224/25 P. This document does not exist in English.
maj 14, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0225: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#KORFIN, s.r.o and SEMPIOLA INVEST LIMITED v SLOVNAFT, a.s.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Directive 2004/25/EC – Takeover bid – Article 2(1)(a) – Squeeze-out of holders of securities – Offer made by a person controlling the offeree company – Making of the offer following the acquisition of such control – Lack of voluntary nature of the takeover bid.#Case C-225/25.
junij 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0225_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 May 2026.#KORFIN, s.r.o and SEMPIOLA INVEST LIMITED v SLOVNAFT, a.s.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Directive 2004/25/EC – Takeover bid – Article 2(1)(a) – Squeeze-out of holders of securities – Offer made by a person controlling the offeree company – Making of the offer following the acquisition of such control – Lack of voluntary nature of the takeover bid.#Case C-225/25.
junij 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0232: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Z.R. and Ś. v U. and Z.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Article 5(3) – Special jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Place where the harmful event occurred or may occur – Natural and legal persons claiming breach of their personality rights as a result of the broadcast of audiovisual content on television and on the internet – International jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State other than the Member State where that content was produced – Place where the damage occurred – Centre of interests of those persons – Content
julij 10, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0234: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Sky Österreich Fernsehen GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EC – Exceptions from the right of withdrawal – Contracts for the supply of digital content which is not supplied on a tangible medium – Article 16(m) – Subscription to a streaming service – Supply of digital services – Offer of a dynamic nature going beyond the mere stable and, as the case may be, continuous provision of specific content.#Case C-234/25.
avgust 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0234_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Sky Österreich Fernsehen GmbH v Verein für Konsumenteninformation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EC – Exceptions from the right of withdrawal – Contracts for the supply of digital content which is not supplied on a tangible medium – Article 16(m) – Subscription to a streaming service – Supply of digital services – Offer of a dynamic nature going beyond the mere stable and, as the case may be, continuous provision of specific content.#Case C-234/25.
maj 01, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CJ0246: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2026.#AS v BNP Paribas Bank Polska S.A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Addendum to a mortgage loan agreement – Consequences of the nullity of that addendum on the validity of that contract – Principles of effectiveness and proportionality – Deterrent effect – Conditions for the continued existence of the contract – Obligations of the national court.#Case C-246/25.