julij 20, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0850: Case C-850/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 9 June 2026 Appeal brought on 18 December 2025 by Swissgrid AG against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 8 October 2025 – T-557/23, Swissgrid v ACER (Appeal–Regulation (EU) 2017/2195–European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)–Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed–Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice–Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law–Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
julij 20, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0851: Case C-851/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 9 June 2026 Appeal brought on 18 December 2025 by Swissgrid AG against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 8 October 2025 – T-558/23, Swissgrid v ACER (Appeal–Regulation (EU) 2017/2195–European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)–Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed–Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice–Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law–Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
junij 08, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0867: Case C-867/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 14 April 2026 Appeal brought on 30 December 2025 by Homestar sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 October 2025 – T-611/24, Homestar v EUIPO – General Sanitary (THERMATEC) (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
junij 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0868: Case C-868/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 April 2026 Appeal brought on 29 December 2025 by European Lotto and Betting ltd. against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 October 2025 – T-375/24, European Lotto and Betting v EUIPO – Multi-State Lottery Association (Powerball) (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
avgust 03, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0874: Case C-874/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 June 2026 Appeal brought on 30 December 2025 by MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2025 – T-290/23, MeSoFa v SRB (Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
avgust 03, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0875: Case C-875/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 June 2026 Appeal brought on 30 December 2025 by MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2025 – T-291/23, MeSoFa v SRB (Appeal – Economic and monetary union – Banking union – Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 – Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
avgust 31, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0876: Case C-876/25 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 July 2026 Appeal brought on 29 December 2025 by Robert Wandert Jagtenberg against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 31 October 2025 – T-319/25, Jagtenberg v Commission (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Obligation for non-privileged parties to be represented before the Courts of the European Union – Third and seventh paragraphs of Article 19 of the Statue of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Prohibition on self-representation – University teacher – Right of audience – Proof – Appeal clearly inadmissible)
junij 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0883: Case C-883/25, Galindo Giralt v Spain: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2026 – María del Pilar Galindo Giralt v Kingdom of Spain (Action brought by a natural person against a Member State – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
marec 05, 2026 0 25 CELEX:62025CC0005: Opinion of Advocate General Spielmann delivered on 5 March 2026.###
marec 19, 2026 0 20 CELEX:62025CC0007: Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 19 March 2026.###