junij 15, 2026 0 3 CELEX:62025CB0732: Case C-732/25, Volkswagen: Order of the President of the Court of 9 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Steyr – Austria) – DQ v Volkswagen AG
junij 15, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0753: Case C-753/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 14 April 2026 Appeal brought on 21 November 2025 by Industria de Diseño Textil, SA against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 September 2025 – T-425/24, Ffauf Italia v EUIPO (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
junij 15, 2026 0 5 CELEX:62025CB0768: Case C-768/25: Order of the President of the Court of 24 March 2026 – Commission v Portugal
julij 13, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0777: Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Action for failure to act – Failure by the European Commission to bring infringement proceedings – Application for a direction to be issued to an institution of the European Union and to a Member State – Action for damages: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 June 2026 Appeal brought on 2 December 2025 by Per Gunnar Norlin against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 October 2025 – T-406/25, Norlin v Commission (Case C-777/25 P)
maj 26, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0824: Case C-824/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 14 April 2026 Appeal brought on 12 December 2025 by Frutaria Innovation SL against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2025 – T-381/24, Frutaria Innovation v EUIPO – Schneider (Frutaria) (Appeal–EU trade mark–Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed–Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice–Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law–Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
junij 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0849: Case C-849/25 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 May 2026 Appeal brought on 17 December 2025 by Swissgrid AG against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, sitting with five judges) of 8 October 2025 – T-556/23, Swissgrid v ACER (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Second paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a party which was not unsuccessful in its submissions at first instance – Appeal manifestly inadmissible)
julij 20, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0850: Case C-850/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 9 June 2026 Appeal brought on 18 December 2025 by Swissgrid AG against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 8 October 2025 – T-557/23, Swissgrid v ACER (Appeal–Regulation (EU) 2017/2195–European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)–Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed–Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice–Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law–Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
julij 20, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0851: Case C-851/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 9 June 2026 Appeal brought on 18 December 2025 by Swissgrid AG against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, sitting with five Judges) of 8 October 2025 – T-558/23, Swissgrid v ACER (Appeal–Regulation (EU) 2017/2195–European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER)–Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed–Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice–Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law–Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
junij 08, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0867: Case C-867/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 14 April 2026 Appeal brought on 30 December 2025 by Homestar sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 October 2025 – T-611/24, Homestar v EUIPO – General Sanitary (THERMATEC) (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)
junij 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62025CB0868: Case C-868/25 P: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 April 2026 Appeal brought on 29 December 2025 by European Lotto and Betting ltd. against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 October 2025 – T-375/24, European Lotto and Betting v EUIPO – Multi-State Lottery Association (Powerball) (Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed)