Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62025CB0516: Case C-516/25 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 April 2026 Appeal brought on 29 July 2025 by Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA), Bernard O’Connor against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 May 2025 – T-70/25, APEDA and O’Connor v Commission (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Public access to documents of the EU institutions – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4 – Exceptions to the right of access – Request for access to certain documents relating to an application for registration of a name as a protected geographical indication – Partial refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings)

0 0

CELEX:62025CB0526: C-526/25, Volkswagen: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bezirksgericht Steyr – Austria) – XV v Volkswagen AG (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility)

0 0

CELEX:62025CB0561: Case C-561/25, Allianz Bulgaria Zhivot: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad – Bulgaria) – BF v ZAD Allianz Bulgaria Zhivot (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to present the regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient detail – Manifest inadmissibility)

0 0

CELEX:62025CB0582: Case C-582/25 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 May 2026 Appeal brought on 26 August 2025 by Alireza Malekzadeh Arasteh against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 August 2025 – T-421/25, Arasteh v Commission (Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Representation of non-privileged parties in an action before the Courts of the European Union – Third and fourth paragraphs of Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Requirement to be represented by a lawyer – Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

0 0

CELEX:62025CB0589: Case C-589/25, Momari: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 March 2026 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Giustizia amministrativa per la Regione siciliana Italy) – Ministry of the Interior, Ragusa Police Headquarters v TV, acting as legal representative of 23 PLAY srls (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions – Gambling – Collection and management of bets – Conditions for authorisation – National legislation making the collection of bets subject to the obtaining of a police authorisation and

0 0

CELEX:62025CB0593: Case C-593/25, Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 25 March 2026 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny – Poland) – T. sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Katowicach (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Article 21(5) – Excise duties collected by a Member State in breach of EU law – The electricity producer’s right to reimbursement of the amount overpaid – Case-law practice making the right to reimbursement conditional upon proof of financial loss – U

RSS
First29422943294429452947294929502951Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top