Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0366:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 13 février 2025.#EN contre Cour de justice de l'Union européenne.#Fonction publique – Fonctionnaires – Sécurité sociale – Article 72, paragraphe 1, du statut – Article 3, paragraphe 1, de la réglementation commune – Contribution au RCAM – Bulletin de rémunération – Acte non susceptible de recours – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-366/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024TO0367: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 October 2024.#Evroins inshurans grup AD v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Interim relief – European System of Financial Supervisors – Mechanism enabling EIOPA to deal with breaches of EU law by the national authorities in their supervisory activities – Decision not to open an investigation – Refusal of a request not to publish a decision – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-367/24 R.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0367_INF: Order of the President of the General Court of 11 October 2024.#Evroins inshurans grup AD v European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority.#Interim relief – European System of Financial Supervisors – Mechanism enabling EIOPA to deal with breaches of EU law by the national authorities in their supervisory activities – Decision not to open an investigation – Refusal of a request not to publish a decision – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.#Case T-367/24 R.

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0373:           Ordonnance du Tribunal (quatrième chambre) du 7 mai 2025.#Debrégeas et associés Pharma (D&A Pharma) contre Agence européenne des médicaments.#Recours en annulation – Médicaments à usage humain – Autorisation de mise sur le marché de l’Alcover granules – Avis scientifique défavorable du comité des médicaments à usage humain – Rejet d’une demande de “rétractation” – Absence d’intérêt à agir – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-373/24.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024TO0374: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2025.#AirPlus International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ CASHLAB – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus Travel Expense Card and earlier EU figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation 201

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0374_INF: Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2025.#AirPlus International GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark R+ CASHLAB – Earlier EU word marks AirPlus International, AirPlus Connect and AirPlus Travel Expense Card and earlier EU figurative mark AirPlus INTERNATIONAL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Well-known facts – Refusal of the request for oral proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Article 96(1) of Regulation

0 0

CELEX:62024TO0392: Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 November 2024.#Raf Verbeke and Elias Vlerick v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU) 2024/1263 – Regulation (EU) 2024/1264 – Directive (EU) 2024/1265 – Legislative act – Act entailing implementing measures – Lack of direct concern – Manifest inadmissibility – Request for ‘constitutional dialogue’ with the Cour constitutionnelle (Constitutional Court, Belgium) – Clear lack of jurisdiction.#Case T-392/24.

RSS
First29242925292629272929293129322933Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top