november 25, 2024 0 103 CELEX:62024TB0211: Case T-211/24: Order of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – SZ DJI Technology v EUIPO – Vision Research (PHANTOM)
januar 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TB0212: Case T-212/24: Order of the General Court of 22 October 2024 – Kaili v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Member of the European Parliament – Privileges and immunities – Decision to waive parliamentary immunity – Expiry of an MEP’s mandate – No longer any interest in bringing proceedings – No need to adjudicate)
avgust 18, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TB0213(01): Case T-213/24: Order of the General Court of 22 May 2025 – Cortex v Commission (Action for annulment – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition for any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, to land in, take off from or overfly the territory of the Union – Articles 3d and 12 of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Act not amenable to review – Inadmissibility)
september 23, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024TB0213: Case T-213/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 6 August 2024 – Cortex Havacilik ve Turizm Ticaret v Commission (Interim measures – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition for any non-Russian-registered aircraft which is owned or chartered, or otherwise controlled by any Russian natural or legal person, entity or body, to land in, take off from or overfly the territory of the European Union – Article 3d of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Manifest inadmissibility of the main action – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility)
april 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TB0216: Case T-216/24: Order of the General Court of 3 February 2025 – Kerkosand v Commission (Action for failure to act – State aid – Adoption of a position by the Commission after the action was brought and putting an end to the failure to act – Compliance with a judgment of the General Court – Action which has become devoid of purpose – No need to adjudicate)
april 22, 2025 0 19 CELEX:62024TB0217(01): Case T-217/24: Order of the General Court of 24 January 2025 – YU v Commission (Action for damages – State aid – Complaints – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Concept of interested party – No illegality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
september 09, 2024 0 23 CELEX:62024TB0217: Case T-217/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 22 July 2024 – YU v Commission (Interim measures – State aid – Complaints to the Commission – Application for interim measures – Lack of urgency)
december 09, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024TB0221: Case T-211/24 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 16 October 2024 – Pumpyanskiy v Council (Interim measures – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – No urgency)
september 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TB0223: Case T-223/24: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2025 – Pinpoint Innovations v Commission (Research and technological development – Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Development of a data analysis system to reduce delays in healthcare – Grant agreement – Actual recovery of a debt by the mutual insurance mechanism – Manifest lack of jurisdiction in part – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
februar 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TB0230: Case T-230/24: Order of the General Court of 29 November 2024 – TelForceOne v EUIPO – 4Kraft (Wheels for vehicles (except for rail vehicles)) (Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant – Inadmissibility)