oktober 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0021_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 January 2025.#Atusa Grupo Empresarial, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark SYC – International registration of the earlier word mark SYR – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-21/24.
december 06, 2024 0 73 CELEX:62024TJ0022: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 December 2024.#Jula AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-22/24.
oktober 24, 2025 0 36 CELEX:62024TJ0022_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 4 December 2024.#Jula AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-22/24.
marec 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0023: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Quevedo Port – Earlier PDO ‘Porto/Port’ – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-23/24.
oktober 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0023_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 26 February 2025.#Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP (IVDP) v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark Quevedo Port – Earlier PDO ‘Porto/Port’ – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 103(2)(a)(ii) and (b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concepts of ‘use’ and ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-23/24.
marec 08, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0026: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Funline International Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUNGLE JUICE – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer – Admissibility.#Case T-26/24.
julij 31, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0026_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 March 2025.#Funline International Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark JUNGLE JUICE – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 58(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer – Admissibility.#Case T-26/24.
december 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0030: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 December 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Li Puma Design – Earlier EU figurative marks PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Link between the marks at issue.#Case T-30/24.
september 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0031: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing two chevrons pointing to the right – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark.#Case T-31/24.
september 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024TJ0032: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025 (Extracts).#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing eight inverted black chevrons – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Cross-claim – Subject matter of the action – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility.#Case T-32/24.