februar 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0607: Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-607/24 P.
avgust 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0607_INF: Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-607/24 P.
februar 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0608: Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-608/24 P.
avgust 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0608_INF: Order of the Court of 11 February 2025.#W.B. Studio Sas di Wivian Bodini & C. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-608/24 P.
februar 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0614: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#RS v European Investment Bank.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Staff member of the European Investment Bank (EIB) – Non-conversion of a fixed-term contract into a contract of indefinite duration – Legitimate expectations – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-614/24 P.
julij 07, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0614_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 February 2025.#RS v European Investment Bank.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Staff member of the European Investment Bank (EIB) – Non-conversion of a fixed-term contract into a contract of indefinite duration – Legitimate expectations – Action for annulment and for damages.#Case C-614/24 P.
marec 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0620: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 25 February 2025.#WebGroup Czech Republic, a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Single market for digital services – Article 33(4) – Designation as a very large online platform – Article 39 – Additional online advertising transparency – Action for annulment – Weighing up of interests.#Case C-620/24 P(R).
oktober 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0620_SUM: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 25 February 2025.#WebGroup Czech Republic, a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal – Interim relief – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 – Single market for digital services – Article 33(4) – Designation as a very large online platform – Article 39 – Additional online advertising transparency – Action for annulment – Weighing up of interests.#Case C-620/24 P(R).
september 12, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0625: Ordonnance de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 4 septembre 2025.#« ClaimCompass » EOOD.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 53, paragraphe 2, et article 94, sous c), du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Exigence d’indication des raisons justifiant la nécessité d’une réponse par la Cour – Absence de précisions suffisantes – Irrecevabilité manifeste.#Affaire C-625/24. This document does not exist in English.
januar 06, 2026 0 32 CELEX:62024CO0625_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Case C-625/24.