Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0409: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#J-GmbH and D v Finanzamt K and Finanzamt F.#References for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – Short-term accommodation in hotels and similar establishments – Annex III, point (12) – Reduced rate of VAT applicable to accommodation provided in hotels and similar establishments – Supplies that are ancillary to accommodation – National regulations establishing a mechanism for separating taxable transactions – No application of the reduced VAT rate to supplies that are not directly used for the accommodation – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Joined Cases

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0409_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#J-GmbH and D v Finanzamt K and Finanzamt F.#References for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 98 – Option for the Member States to apply a reduced rate of VAT to certain supplies of goods and services – Short-term accommodation in hotels and similar establishments – Annex III, point (12) – Reduced rate of VAT applicable to accommodation provided in hotels and similar establishments – Supplies that are ancillary to accommodation – National regulations establishing a mechanism for separating taxable transactions – No application of the reduced VAT rate to supplies that are not directly used for the accommodation – Principle of fiscal neutrality.#Joined C

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0412: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS and Fauré Le Page Paris SAS v Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 3(1)(g) – Grounds for refusal of registration or invalidity of a trade mark – Trade mark of such a nature as to deceive the public – Luxury leather goods – Trade mark which includes a number perceived by the relevant public as indicating the year of establishment of a business – Evocation, because that year is the distant past, of long-standing know-how bestowing on the product concerned a perceived guarantee of quality and a prestigious image – Misleading indication as to the characteristics of the product.#Case C-412/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0412_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2026.#Fauré Le Page Maroquinier SAS and Fauré Le Page Paris SAS v Goyard ST-Honoré SAS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive 2008/95/EC – Article 3(1)(g) – Grounds for refusal of registration or invalidity of a trade mark – Trade mark of such a nature as to deceive the public – Luxury leather goods – Trade mark which includes a number perceived by the relevant public as indicating the year of establishment of a business – Evocation, because that year is the distant past, of long-standing know-how bestowing on the product concerned a perceived guarantee of quality and a prestigious image – Misleading indication as to the characteristic

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0413: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#Vlaams Gewest v P&O North Sea Ferries Limited and P&O Ferries Limited.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 – Application of the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport between Member States and between Member States and third countries – Article 56 TFEU – Article 191 of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions – National legislation providing for the payment of a charge for the mandatory use of a vessel traffic services system (‘Verkeersbegelei

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0413_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#Vlaams Gewest v P&O North Sea Ferries Limited and P&O Ferries Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ondernemingsrechtbank Gent, afdeling Oostende.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 – Application of the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport between Member States and between Member States and third countries – Article 56 TFEU – Article 191 of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions – National legislation providing for the pa

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0414: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2026.#Datenschutzbehörde and Dr. G S v Bundesministerin für Justiz and D GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 77 and 79 – Remedies – Parallel exercise – Relationship between the lodging of a complaint with a national supervisory authority and the exercise of a judicial remedy – Risk of contradictory decisions – Principle of effective judicial protection – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Principle of effectiveness – Principle of equivalence.#Case C-414/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0416: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#On Air Media Professionals SRL v Agenția pentru Întreprinderi Mici şi Mijlocii Iași.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Exemption for certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market – Translation error in the Romanian language version of that regulation – Legal effects of the regulation correcting that error – Possibility of recovering aid that was granted before the correction in compliance with the conditions set out in the version of the regulation containing the translation error – Protection of legitimate expectations – Legal certainty.#Case C-416/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0416_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#On Air Media Professionals SRL v Agenția pentru Întreprinderi Mici şi Mijlocii Iași.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Exemption for certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market – Translation error in the Romanian language version of that regulation – Legal effects of the regulation correcting that error – Possibility of recovering aid that was granted before the correction in compliance with the conditions set out in the version of the regulation containing the translation error – Protection of legitimate expectations – Legal certainty.#Case C-416/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0418: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 April 2026.#TJ v Comunidad de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Fixed-term employment contracts in the public sector – Clause 5 – Measures to prevent and penalise the abuse of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships – Conversion of successive fixed-term contracts into a contract of indefinite duration – National legislation not permitting such conversion, but laying down other measures to prevent and penalise such abuse – Effective, dissuasive and proportionate penalty measures.#Case C-418/24.

RSS
First26172618261926202622262426252626Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top