december 13, 2024 0 15 CELEX:62024CO0332_INF: Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 27 June 2024.#Identité et Démocratie Parti (ID Parti) v Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations.#Case C-332/24 P(R).
julij 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0333: Order of the Court of 19 July 2024.#Sumol + Compal Marcas SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-333/24 P.
september 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0334: Order of the Court of 3 September 2024.#DEC Technologies BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-334/24 P.
februar 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0334_INF: Order of the Court of 3 September 2024.#DEC Technologies BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-334/24 P.
oktober 10, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0335: Order of the Court of 2 October 2024.#Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency and development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-335/24 P.
december 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0336: Ordonnance du président de la huitième chambre de la Cour du 22 novembre 2024.#„SINHRON INVEST“ EOOD contre Sofiyska gradska prokuratura.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Questions préjudicielles identiques à des questions sur lesquelles la Cour a déjà statué – Article 48 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Présomption d’innocence et droits de la défense – Infliction d’une sanction pénale à une personne morale pour une infraction relative à la taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) commise par le représentant de cette personne morale – Procédure pénale parallèle non clôturée contre ce représentant.#Affaire C-336/24. This document does not exist in English.
september 26, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0339: Order of the Court of 18 September 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-339/24 P.
november 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0344: Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 11 novembre 2024.#Christos Papasotiriou contre Conseil de l'Union européenne et Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Article181 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Article 19 du statut de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne – Pourvoi introduit sans le ministère d’un avocat – Pourvoi manifestement irrecevable.#Affaire C-344/24 P. This document does not exist in English.
februar 12, 2025 0 86 CELEX:62024CO0344_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 November 2024.#Christos Papasotiriou v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Case C-344/24 P.
oktober 02, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62024CO0355: Order of the Court of 24 September 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-355/24 P.