november 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0500: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Grupo Massimo Dutti SA v Administración General del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Determination – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 147 – Successive sales.#Case C-500/24.
februar 04, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0500_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Grupo Massimo Dutti SA v Administración General del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 – Community Customs Code – Article 29 – Value of goods for customs purposes – Determination – Goods sold for export to the customs territory of the European Union – Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Article 147 – Successive sales.#Case C-500/24.
november 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0509: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Investcapital Ltd v M.H.S.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) – Article 7(1) – Contract concerning a bank account – Order for payment procedure – Review of the court’s own motion of whether contractual terms are unfair – Proposal by the court to reduce the claim by the amount corresponding to the application of a term considered to be unfair – Acceptance by the seller or supplier and possibility to claim that amount in subsequent proceedings – Principle of effectiveness – Participation of the consumer in the review of whether a contractual term is unfair.#Case C-509/24.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0509_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Investcapital Ltd v M.H.S.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción de Arucas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 6(1) – Article 7(1) – Contract concerning a bank account – Order for payment procedure – Review of the court’s own motion of whether contractual terms are unfair – Proposal by the court to reduce the claim by the amount corresponding to the application of a term considered to be unfair – Acceptance by the seller or supplier and possibility to claim that amount in subsequent proceedings – Principle of effectiveness – Participation of the consumer in the review of whether a contractual te
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0510: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#PROFIL-COPY 2002 Irodatechnikai Kft. v Közigazgatási és Területfejlesztési Minisztérium.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Economic, social and territorial cohesion – EU funds – Management and control – Obligation for Member States to make arrangements to ensure the effective examination of complaints concerning EU funds – National legislation excluding any judicial remedy against a decision ordering repayment of an EU grant on account of an irregularity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-510/24.
december 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0510_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#PROFIL-COPY 2002 Irodatechnikai Kft. v Közigazgatási és Területfejlesztési Minisztérium.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Economic, social and territorial cohesion – EU funds – Management and control – Obligation for Member States to make arrangements to ensure the effective examination of complaints concerning EU funds – National legislation excluding any judicial remedy against a decision ordering repayment of an EU grant on account of an irregularity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-510/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0512: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#BÁV Zrt. v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals – Annex XVII – Restrictions on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of certain dangerous substances, mixtures and articles – Restrictions concerning cadmium – Maximum concentration in metal parts of jewellery and imitation jewellery articles and hair accessories – Derogation – Silver bracelet dating from the 1940s, the brazing of which contains cadmium.#Case C-512/24.
januar 13, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0512_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#BÁV Zrt. v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals – Annex XVII – Restrictions on the manufacture, placing on the market and use of certain dangerous substances, mixtures and articles – Restrictions concerning cadmium – Maximum concentration in metal parts of jewellery and imitation jewellery articles and hair accessories – Derogation – Silver bracelet dating from the 1940s, the brazing of which contains cadmium.#Case C-512/24.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0513: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2026.#Oblastní nemocnice Kolín, a. s., nemocnice Středočeského kraje v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Right to deduct VAT – Article 173(1) – Proportional deduction – Expenditure forming part of the general costs of a taxable person – Minimum technical and material equipment of healthcare facilities required in order to obtain a licence to supply healthcare services in respect of which VAT is not deductible – Services necessary for the supply of services in respect of which VAT is deductible.#Case C-513/24.
marec 12, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0514: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#Magyar Telekom Nyrt. v Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Elnöke.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Telecommunications sector – Directive (EU) 2018/1972 – European Electronic Communications Code – First subparagraph of Article 105(4) – Right of end-users to terminate their contact without further costs due to modifications unilaterally proposed by a provider of electronic communication services – Exceptions – Modifications directly imposed by EU law or national law.#Case C-514/24.