januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0391_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 October 2025.#Criminal proceedings against.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments and probation decisions – Article 1 – Scope – Supervised release with an obligation to undergo inpatient medical treatment in a closed institution – Measure involving deprivation of liberty – Obligation of recognition and enforcement.#Case C-391/24.
junij 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0396: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#PU and Others v mBank S.A. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 7(1) – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency, containing unfair terms – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Nullity of that agreement – Repayment by the consumer of the amount of the loan obtained under a void agreement irrespective of repayments made – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Acceptance by the consumer of the claim for repayment – Obligation on the national court to make the judgment against the defendant immediately enforceable.#Case C-396/24.
marec 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0396_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#mBank S.A. and Others v BL and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 7(1) – Mortgage loan agreement indexed to a foreign currency, containing unfair terms – Effects of a finding that a term is unfair – Nullity of that agreement – Repayment by the consumer of the amount of the loan obtained under a void agreement irrespective of repayments made – Deterrent effect of the prohibition on unfair terms – Acceptance by the consumer of the claim for repayment – Obligation on the national court to make the judgment against the defendant immediately enforceable.#
november 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0398: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#A v B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 25(1) – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Agreement null and void as to its substantive validity under the law of the Member State of the court seised of the case – Concept.#Case C-398/24.
april 16, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0398_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#A v B.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 25(1) – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Agreement null and void as to its substantive validity under the law of the Member State of the court seised of the case – Concept.#Case C-398/24.
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0399: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#AirHelp Germany GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation for air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Conditions – Article 5(3) – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Concept of ‘reasonable measures’ to avoid extraordinary circumstances or the consequences thereof – Aircraft struck by lightning during the preceding flight and therefore subject to a mandatory inspection.#Case C-399/24.
december 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0399_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#AirHelp Germany GmbH v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Compensation for air passengers in the event of long delay of flights – Conditions – Article 5(3) – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Concept of ‘reasonable measures’ to avoid extraordinary circumstances or the consequences thereof – Aircraft struck by lightning during the preceding flight and therefore subject to a mandatory inspection.#Case C-399/24.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0401: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Staten genom Sjöfartsverket v Stockholms Hamn AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Stockholms tingsrätt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Agreement concluded before the accession of the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union – Compensation for the loss of revenue arising from the abolition of passage fees for a lock – Concept of aid – Concept of undertaking – Economic activity – Existing or new aid.#Case C-401/24.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0401_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Staten genom Sjöfartsverket v Stockholms Hamn AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Agreement concluded before the accession of the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union – Compensation for the loss of revenue arising from the abolition of passage fees for a lock – Concept of aid – Concept of undertaking – Economic activity – Existing or new aid.#Case C-401/24.
november 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0402: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#BL v Dr. A, en qualité de mandataire liquidateur de Luftfahrtgesellschaft Walter mbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – First subparagraph of Article 3(1) – Incorrect or incomplete notification of the projected collective redundancies to the competent public authority – First subparagraph of Article 4(1) – 30-day standstill period – Validity of the redundancies – Article 6 – Penalties.#Case C-402/24.