december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0136: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non‑contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case.#Case C-136/24 P.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0136_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Alaa Hamoudi v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 – European integrated management of the European Union’s external borders – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations relating to the protection of fundamental rights – Practices of pushback to a third country in the Aegean Sea region – Non‑contractual liability of Frontex – Actual and certain damage – Burden of proof – Effective judicial protection – Prima facie evidence – Duty of the General Court of the European Union to investigate the case.#Case C-136/24 P.
november 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0137: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Michael Heßler v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Pre-litigation procedure – Article 90 – Concept of an act adversely affecting an official – Tax for the benefit of the European Union – Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 – Article 3 – Tax abatement for a dependent child – Conditions for granting – Concept of ‘dependent child’ – Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Article 2 – Dependent child allowance.#Case C-137/24 P.
julij 15, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0137_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Michael Heßler v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Pre-litigation procedure – Article 90 – Concept of an act adversely affecting an official – Tax for the benefit of the European Union – Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 260/68 – Article 3 – Tax abatement for a dependent child – Conditions for granting – Concept of ‘dependent child’ – Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Article 2 – Dependent child allowance.#Case C-137/24 P.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0142: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#Familienstiftung v Finanzamt Köln-West.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Inheritance and gift tax – Taxation of the inter vivos transfer of assets in order to set up a foundation – Family foundation with its seat in Liechtenstein – Coherence of the tax system.#Case C-142/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0142_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#Familienstiftung v Finanzamt Köln-West.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Inheritance and gift tax – Taxation of the inter vivos transfer of assets in order to set up a foundation – Family foundation with its seat in Liechtenstein – Coherence of the tax system.#Case C-142/24.
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0144: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Freedom of establishment – National legislation establishing reference prices for certain basic construction materials below market prices – Obligation to pay an ‘additional mining fee’ corresponding to 90% of the difference between the reference price and the selling price – Measure mainly affecting undertakings held by companies established in other Member States – No justification – Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Article 1(1)(d) – Concept of ‘other requirements’.#Case C-144/24.
maj 01, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0144_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Freedom of establishment – National legislation establishing reference prices for certain basic construction materials below market prices – Obligation to pay an ‘additional mining fee’ corresponding to 90% of the difference between the reference price and the selling price – Measure mainly affecting undertakings held by companies established in other Member States – No justification – Procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services – Directive (EU) 2015/1535 – Article 1(1)(d) – Concept of ‘other requirements’.#Case C-144/24.
november 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0146: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Fugro NV v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Taxation – Combating of tax avoidance – Directive (EU) 2022/2523 – Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union – Article 17 – International shipping income exclusion – Challenge to the scope of that exclusion – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern.#Case C-146/24 P.
junij 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0146_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 October 2025.#Fugro NV v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Taxation – Combating of tax avoidance – Directive (EU) 2022/2523 – Global minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprise groups and large-scale domestic groups in the Union – Article 17 – International shipping income exclusion – Challenge to the scope of that exclusion – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Locus standi – Lack of individual concern.#Case C-146/24 P.