avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0092: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Banca Mediolanum SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate - Direzione Regionale della Lombardia.#References for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Directive 2011/96/EU – Article 4(1)(a) – Prohibition on taxing profits received by the parent company – Prevention of double taxation of dividends – Scope – Regional tax on production activities – Inclusion of 50% of dividends received by the parent companies in the basis of assessment for that tax.#Joined Cases C-92/24 and C-93/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0092_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Banca Mediolanum SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate - Direzione Regionale della Lombardia.#References for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Directive 2011/96/EU – Article 4(1)(a) – Prohibition on taxing profits received by the parent company – Prevention of double taxation of dividends – Scope – Regional tax on production activities – Inclusion of 50% of dividends received by the parent companies in the basis of assessment for that tax.#Joined Cases C-92/24 and C-93/24.
maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0095: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 May 2026.#ATAU v Procura generale presso la Corte d’appello di Napoli.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant – Surrender procedure between Member States – Optional grounds for non-execution – Article 4(6) – Undertaking by the executing Member State to execute the sentence in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty – Grounds for non-recognition and non-enforcement – Article 9(1)(i) – Person concerned who did not appear in person at the trial resulting in his or her conviction –
maj 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0095_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 21 mai 2026.#ATAU contre Procura generale presso la Corte d’appello di Napoli.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Décision‑cadre 2002/584/JAI – Mandat d’arrêt européen – Procédure de remise entre États membres – Motifs facultatifs de non-exécution – Article 4, point 6 – Engagement de l’État membre d’exécution à exécuter la peine conformément à son droit interne – Décision‑cadre 2008/909/JAI – Reconnaissance mutuelle des jugements en matière pénale prononçant des peines ou des mesures privatives de liberté – Motifs de non-reconnaissance et de non-exécution – Article 9, paragraphe 1, sous i) – Intéressé n’ayant pas comparu en personne au procès ayant mené à sa condamnation – Information qua This document does not exist in English.
julij 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0096: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#X.Y. e.a. contre Prokuratura Krajowa e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – État de droit – Indépendance des juges – Article 19, paragraphe 1, second alinéa, TUE – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Réglementation nationale permettant de vérifier le respect des exigences d’indépendance et d’impartialité d’un juge en poste au sein du Sąd Najwyższy (Cour suprême, Pologne) – Composition de la formation de jugement appelée à contrôler le respect de ces exigences – Irrégularité des conditions de nomination d’un membre d’une telle formation – Conséquences à tirer de cette irrégularité – Impartialité – Primauté du droit de l’Union.#Affaires jointes C-96/24, C-103/24 et C-112/24. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0097: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#S.A. and R.J. v The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law – Sufficiently serious infringement – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Significant influx of applicants for temporary or international protection – No access to material reception conditions – Basic needs – Temporary exhaustion of housing capacity.#Case C-97/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0097_RES: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#S.A. and R.J. v The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law – Sufficiently serious infringement – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Significant influx of applicants for temporary or international protection – No access to material reception conditions – Basic needs – Temporary exhaustion of housing capacity.#Case C-97/24.
julij 10, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0099: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#G.M.K.-Z.B.M. v S.O.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 66 – Scope ratione temporis – Legal proceedings instituted by a claimant – Issue of an order for payment – Statement of opposition by the defendant to that order for payment seeking a review of the case concerned – Regulation (EU) No 44/2001 – Article 5(3) – Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Article 6(1) – More than one defendant – Article 22(1) – Exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of immovable property – Action for payment of compensation for the non-contractual use of im
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0099_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#G.M.K.-Z.B.M. v S.O.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Koszalinie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Article 66 – Scope ratione temporis – Legal proceedings instituted by a claimant – Issue of an order for payment – Statement of opposition by the defendant to that order for payment seeking a review of the case concerned – Regulation (EU) No 44/2001 – Article 5(3) – Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict – Article 6(1) – More than one defendant – Article 22(1) – Exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings which have as their object rights in rem in immovable property or tenancies of immovable proper
maj 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0100: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2025.#Verbraucherzentrale Hamburg e.V. v bonprix Handelsgesellschaft mbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic commerce – Directive 2000/31/EC – Commercial communications – Article 6(c) – Concept of ‘promotional offers’ – Online advertising setting out a specific payment arrangement – Purchase on invoice involving a deferral of payment of the sales price – Information on the need for a prior assessment of the consumer’s creditworthiness only during the online ordering process.#Case C-100/24.