januar 29, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0431_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#W v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 23(1) – Access to the information in the file of an applicant for international protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4, Article 18 and Article 19(2) – Principle of non-refoulement – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Right to a fair trial – Investigation in the applicant’s country of origin – Rejection of an application for international protection and adoption of a return decision – Access of the court of first instance and the
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0433: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Galerie Karsten Greve v Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Special arrangements for second-hand goods, works of art, collectors’ items and antiques – Taxable dealers – Margin scheme – Article 316(1)(b) – Option to apply the margin scheme – Concept of ‘supply of a work of art by the creator’ – Supply by the creator through a legal person.#Case C-433/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0433_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Galerie Karsten Greve v Ministère de l'Économie, des Finances et de la Souveraineté industrielle et numérique.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Special arrangements for second-hand goods, works of art, collectors’ items and antiques – Taxable dealers – Margin scheme – Article 316(1)(b) – Option to apply the margin scheme – Concept of ‘supply of a work of art by the creator’ – Supply by the creator through a legal person.#Case C-433/24.
marec 05, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0436: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 March 2026.#Skatteverket v Lyko Operations AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 30a – Supply of goods – Concept of ‘voucher’ – Classification – Customer loyalty programme in the form of points awarded on the basis of previous purchases – Points which may be redeemed for products of low value.#Case C-436/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0445: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#MS Amlin Insurance SE v (W)onderweg VZW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Article 3(6) – Concept of ‘traveller’ – Legal person who has concluded a travel contract for its members.#Case C-445/24.
januar 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0445_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#MS Amlin Insurance SE v (W)onderweg VZW.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive (EU) 2015/2302 – Package travel and linked travel arrangements – Article 3(6) – Concept of ‘traveller’ – Legal person who has concluded a travel contract for its members.#Case C-445/24.
september 04, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0451: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#Kwizda Pharma GmbH v Landeshauptmann von Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products – Product which may fall within the definition of ‘medicinal product’ and within the definition of ‘product covered by other Community legislation’ – Applicable legal framework – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 2(2) – Rule of precedence – Scope – Effectiveness – Procedural autonomy of the Member States – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation.#Case C-451/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0452: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Lunapark Scandinavia Oy Ltd v Hardeco Finland Oy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 10 – Exclusive rights of the proprietor of a registered trade mark to oppose the use, by a third party, of a sign which is identical with, or similar to, that mark – Infringement action – Limitations of the exclusive rights of the proprietor of that trade mark – Article 9 and Article 18(1) – Preclusion due to acquiescence – Exhaustive nature of the conditions under which that preclusion can arise – Inapplicability of a general principle of national law that provides for preclusion of the right to prohibit the use of a sign in situations other than those provided for in those articl
januar 13, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0452_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Lunapark Scandinavia Oy Ltd v Hardeco Finland Oy.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade marks – Directive (EU) 2015/2436 – Article 10 – Exclusive rights of the proprietor of a registered trade mark to oppose the use, by a third party, of a sign which is identical with, or similar to, that mark – Infringement action – Limitations of the exclusive rights of the proprietor of that trade mark – Article 9 and Article 18(1) – Preclusion due to acquiescence – Exhaustive nature of the conditions under which that preclusion can arise – Inapplicability of a general principle of national law that provides for preclusion of the right to prohibit the use of a si
januar 22, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0453: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#Sofiyska gradska prokuratura v BC.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA – Mutual recognition of financial penalties – Article 7(2)(g) – Ground for non-recognition and non-execution – Informing the person concerned of his or her right to contest the case and of the time limits of such a legal remedy – Article 7(3) – Obligation to consult the competent authority of the issuing Member State.#Case C-453/24.