oktober 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0416_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#On Air Media Professionals SRL v Agenția pentru Întreprinderi Mici şi Mijlocii Iași.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 – Exemption for certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market – Translation error in the Romanian language version of that regulation – Legal effects of the regulation correcting that error – Possibility of recovering aid that was granted before the correction in compliance with the conditions set out in the version of the regulation containing the translation error – Protection of legitimate expectations – Legal certainty.#Case C-416/24.
junij 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0419: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Société Nouvelle de l’Hôtel Plaza SAS v YG and Pôle emploi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – Article 1(1), first subparagraph, (a) – Concept of ‘workers normally employed’ – Workers supplied by an external undertaking under a contract for the provision of services – Method of calculating the number of those workers in the establishment – No specific obligation imposed by that directive in respect of a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings – Inapplicability of that directive – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-419/24.
oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0419_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Société Nouvelle de l’Hôtel Plaza SAS v YG and Pôle emploi.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 98/59/EC – Collective redundancies – Article 1(1), first subparagraph, (a) – Concept of ‘workers normally employed’ – Workers supplied by an external undertaking under a contract for the provision of services – Method of calculating the number of those workers in the establishment – No specific obligation imposed by that directive in respect of a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings – Inapplicability of that directive – Lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-419/24.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0422: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten v AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 13 and 14 – Scope – Personal data collected by means of body cameras worn by ticket inspectors on public transport – Legal basis for the obligation on the data controller to provide information to the data subject.#Case C-422/24.
februar 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0422_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten v AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 13 and 14 – Scope – Personal data collected by means of body cameras worn by ticket inspectors on public transport – Legal basis for the obligation on the data controller to provide information to the data subject.#Case C-422/24.
avgust 01, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0426: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Appeal – Community plant variety rights – Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 – Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 – Potato variety Melrose (EU 31618) – Failure to pay on time the annual fee due in respect of the Community plant variety right – Service – Cancellation of Community plant variety rights – MyPVR user area – Application for restitutio in integrum – Dismissal of application.#Case C-426/24 P.
september 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0426_INF: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#Romagnoli Fratelli SpA v Community Plant Variety Office.#Appeal – Community plant variety rights – Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 – Regulation (EC) No 874/2009 – Potato variety Melrose (EU 31618) – Failure to pay on time the annual fee due in respect of the Community plant variety right – Service – Cancellation of Community plant variety rights – MyPVR user area – Application for restitutio in integrum – Dismissal of application.#Case C-426/24 P.
april 30, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0429: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#St. Kliment Ohridski Primary Private School EOOD v QX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Article 2(1) – Concept of ‘service contract’ – Article 2(6) – Enrolment contracts for the schooling of children of compulsory school age – Private education – Article 27 – Inertia selling of services – Compulsory subjects in accordance with national education standards.#Case C-429/24.
oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0429_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 30 April 2025.#St. Kliment Ohridski Primary Private School EOOD v QX.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 2011/83/EU – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Article 2(1) – Concept of ‘service contract’ – Article 2(6) – Enrolment contracts for the schooling of children of compulsory school age – Private education – Article 27 – Inertia selling of services – Compulsory subjects in accordance with national education standards.#Case C-429/24.
januar 29, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0431: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#W v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Article 23(1) – Access to the information in the file of an applicant for international protection – Article 46 – Right to an effective remedy – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4, Article 18 and Article 19(2) – Principle of non-refoulement – Second paragraph of Article 47 – Right to a fair trial – Investigation in the applicant’s country of origin – Rejection of an application for international protection and adoption of a return decision – Access of the court of first instance and the app