Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0309:           Arrêt de la Cour (sixième chambre) du 5 mars 2026.#Roberto Passalacqua contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonction publique – Fonctionnaire – Promotion – Exercice de promotion 2021 – Décision de ne pas promouvoir le requérant au grade AD 11 – Article 45, paragraphe 1, du statut des fonctionnaires de l’Union européenne – Comparaison des mérites – Obligation de motivation – Répartition de la charge de la preuve.#Affaire C-309/24 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0310: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#YL v „Elektrorazpredelitelni mrezhi Zapad“ EAD.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Scope – Electricity consumption inaccurately measured owing to meter malfunction – Billing on the basis of estimated electricity consumption – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EU – Scope – Unsolicited supply.#Case C-310/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0310_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#YL v „Elektrorazpredelitelni mrezhi Zapad“ EAD.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Scope – Electricity consumption inaccurately measured owing to meter malfunction – Billing on the basis of estimated electricity consumption – Consumer rights – Directive 2011/83/EU – Scope – Unsolicited supply.#Case C-310/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0311: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2026.#Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v M. GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Unfair competition – Unfair trading practices – Directive (EU) 2019/633 – Prohibition – Article 3(1)(d) – Payment request not related to the sale of the agricultural and food products of the supplier – Point (e) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Power to impose fines – Classification as a ‘single infringement’ of a number of prohibited unfair trading practices giving rise to the imposition of a single fine – Principle ne bis in idem – National legislation providing for a cap on fines.#Case C-311/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0313: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Opera Laboratori Fiorentini SpA v Ministero della Cultura and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5k(1)(c) – Prohibition on awarding and continuing the performance of any public contract or concession to or with a natural or legal person, entity or body acting ‘on behalf or at the direction’ of an ‘entity referred to in point (a) or (b) of this paragraph’ – Award of a public contract by the authorities of a Member State to a resident company two of whose three members of its administrative board are Russian nationals and one of those Ru

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0313_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 February 2026.#Opera Laboratori Fiorentini SpA v Ministero della Cultura and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 – Article 5k(1)(c) – Prohibition on awarding and continuing the performance of any public contract or concession to or with a natural or legal person, entity or body acting ‘on behalf or at the direction’ of an ‘entity referred to in point (a) or (b) of this paragraph’ – Award of a public contract by the authorities of a Member State to a resident company two of whose three members of

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0315: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Nestlé Sverige AB v Miljönämnden i Helsingborgs kommun.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 – Provision of food information to consumers – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/128 – Food for special medical purposes – Specific information requirements – Mandatory nutrition declaration – Article 5(2)(g) – Additional mandatory particulars – Article 6(2) – Prohibition of the repetition on the labelling of information contained in the mandatory nutrition declaration.#Case C-315/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0316:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Agriculture – Produits phytopharmaceutiques – Article 4 – Règlement (CE) no 1107/2009 – Règlement d’exécution (UE) 2021/2049 – Renouvellement de l’approbation de la substance active “cyperméthrine” – Demande de réexamen interne – Règlement (CE) no 1367/2006 – Article 10, paragraphe 1 – Décision de rejet de la demande – Évaluation et gestion des risques – Identification de domaines critiques de préoccupation – Conditions réalistes d’utilisation – Principe de précaution.#Affaire C-316/24 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0316_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Agriculture – Produits phytopharmaceutiques – Article 4 – Règlement (CE) no 1107/2009 – Règlement d’exécution (UE) 2021/2049 – Renouvellement de l’approbation de la substance active “cyperméthrine” – Demande de réexamen interne – Règlement (CE) no 1367/2006 – Article 10, paragraphe 1 – Décision de rejet de la demande – Évaluation et gestion des risques – Identification de domaines critiques de préoccupation – Conditions réalistes d’utilisation – Principe de précaution.#Affaire C-316/24 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0317:           Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 19 juin 2025.#Commission européenne contre République hellénique.#Manquement d’État – Directive 2011/7/UE – Lutte contre le retard de paiement dans les transactions commerciales – Article 4, paragraphe 4, sous b) – Transactions commerciales entre entreprises et pouvoirs publics – Faculté, reconnue aux États membres, de prolonger jusqu’à un maximum de 60 jours civils le délai de paiement imparti aux entités publiques dispensant des soins de santé – Obligation des États membres de veiller à ce que ces entités publiques n’excèdent effectivement pas ce délai.#Affaire C-317/24.

This document does not exist in English.
RSS
First25042505250625072509251125122513Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top