december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0260: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#« Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Wholesale market for fuel in Bulgaria – Margin squeeze on competitors – Product market definition – Vertically divided market – Taking into account the excise duty regime.#Case C-260/24.
februar 23, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0260_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#« Lukoil Bulgaria » EOOD v Komisia za zashtita na konkurentsiata.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-oblast.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of a dominant position – Wholesale market for fuel in Bulgaria – Margin squeeze on competitors – Product market definition – Vertically divided market – Taking into account the excise duty regime.#Case C-260/24.
julij 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0263: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Criminal proceedings against YE.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA – Article 3(1) and (2) – Taking account of previous convictions handed down in another Member State in the course of new criminal proceedings – Legal effects equivalent to previous national convictions – Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA – Exchange of information extracted from the criminal record between Member States – Article 2(a) – Concept of criminal conviction – Administrative offences – Classification of offences under national law – Acts not constituting criminal offences under national law.#Case C-263/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0263_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#Criminal proceedings against YE.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Tutrakan.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA – Article 3(1) and (2) – Taking account of previous convictions handed down in another Member State in the course of new criminal proceedings – Legal effects equivalent to previous national convictions – Framework Decision 2009/315/JHA – Exchange of information extracted from the criminal record between Member States – Article 2(a) – Concept of criminal conviction – Administrative offences – Classification of offences under national law – Acts not constituting criminal offences under national law.#Case C-263/
oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0267: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Кanevi Komers DS EOOD v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond „Zemedelie“.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – Direct support schemes – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Article 15(1) – Exceptions from the application of administrative penalties – Incorrect aid application – Withdrawal of such an application – Notification to the competent national authorities – Administrative penalties in cases of over-declaration of areas – Penalties under Article 19a of Delegated Regulation No 640/2014 – Applicability of that article following the repeal of Delegated Regulation No 640/2014.#Case C-267/24.
december 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0267_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Кanevi Komers DS EOOD v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond „Zemedelie“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Varna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) – Direct support schemes – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Article 15(1) – Exceptions from the application of administrative penalties – Incorrect aid application – Withdrawal of such an application – Notification to the competent national authorities – Administrative penalties in cases of over-declaration of areas – Penalties under Article 19a of Delegated Regulation No 640/2014 – Applicability of that article following the repeal of Delegated Regulation No 640/20
julij 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0268: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#ZT v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Allowance granted in the form of an electronic card, in order to support in-service training of teachers and to enhance their professional skills – No grant of that card to non-tenured teachers responsible for short-term supply teaching posts.#Case C-268/24.
november 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0268_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 3 July 2025.#ZT v Ministero dell’Istruzione e del Merito.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Lecce.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 1999/70/EC – Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP – Clause 4 – Principle of non-discrimination – Allowance granted in the form of an electronic card, in order to support in-service training of teachers and to enhance their professional skills – No grant of that card to non-tenured teachers responsible for short-term supply teaching posts.#Case C-268/24.
marec 13, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0271: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#Igor Shuvalov v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, or stability or security in Ukraine, or which obstruct the work of international organisations in Ukraine.#Case C-271/24 P.
avgust 29, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62024CJ0271_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#Igor Shuvalov v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the appellant’s name – Supporting actions or policies which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, or stability or security in Ukraine, or which obstruct the work of international organisations in Ukraine.#Case C-271/24 P.