Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0221_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Naturvårdsverket v UQ and IC.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Waste – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Article 24(2) – Shipment – Take-back when a shipment is illegal – Take-back of the waste by the competent authority of dispatch – Obligation or possibility for that authority to recover or dispose of the waste despite opposition by the initial dispatcher – Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Validity.#Joined Cases C-221/24 and C-222/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0223:           Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 27 février 2025.#Oil company "Lukoil" PAO contre Registre de transparence e.a.#Pourvoi – Droit institutionnel – Accord interinstitutionnel sur un registre de transparence obligatoire – Radiation de la requérante du registre de transparence – Notification de la décision par voie électronique – Délai de recours – Caractère tardif du recours.#Affaire C-223/24 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0228: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#„Nordcurrent group“ UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Directive 2011/96/EU – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Exemption from corporation tax in respect of dividends paid by a non-resident subsidiary to a resident parent company – Article 1(2) and (3) – Anti-abuse provision – Classification of the subsidiary as a non-genuine arrangement – Steps of an arrangement – Tax advantage.#Case C-228/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0228_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#„Nordcurrent group“ UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Mokestinių ginčų komisija prie Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Directive 2011/96/EU – Common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States – Exemption from corporation tax in respect of dividends paid by a non-resident subsidiary to a resident parent company – Article 1(2) and (3) – Anti-abuse provision – Classification of the subsidiary as a non-genuine arrangement – Steps of an arrangement – Tax advantage.#Case C-228/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0230: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 March 2025.#MF v Banco Santander, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 6(1) and Article 7(1) – Principle of equivalence – Mortgage loan agreements – Term stipulating that costs relating to the contract are to be paid by the consumer – Action for invalidity – Limitation period for an action seeking repayment of sums paid but not due – Actions seeking, respectively, a declaration that a contractual term is invalid and seeking to enforce the restitutory effects of such a declaration subject to different limitation periods.#Case C-230/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0232: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#A Oy v Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Taxable transactions – Exemption relating to the granting of credit – Article 135(1)(b) – Exemption relating to financial transactions – Debt collection – Article 135(1)(d) – Trade factoring – Invoice factoring.#Case C-232/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0234: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Brose Prievidza spol. s r. o. v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 138(1) – Directive 2008/9/EC – Article 4(b) – Refund of VAT to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund – Principal supply and ancillary supply – Artificial splitting of a single supply – No dispatch of the object of the supply.#Case C-234/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0234_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Brose Prievidza spol. s r. o. v Direktor na Direktsia 'Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika' - Sofia pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 138(1) – Directive 2008/9/EC – Article 4(b) – Refund of VAT to taxable persons not established in the Member State of refund – Principal supply and ancillary supply – Artificial splitting of a single supply – No dispatch of the object of the supply.#Case C-234/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0236: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Provincie Oost-Vlaanderen and Sogent v KG and WA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment – Projects listed in Annex II – Determination of the projects to be made subject to an environmental impact assessment (screening) – Article 9a – Prevention of conflicts of interest – Combining the functions of developer and the authority competent to make that determination – Appropriate separation between conflicting functions.#Case C-236/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0236_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Provincie Oost-Vlaanderen and Sogent v KG and WA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2011/92/EU – Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment – Projects listed in Annex II – Determination of the projects to be made subject to an environmental impact assessment (screening) – Article 9a – Prevention of conflicts of interest – Combining the functions of developer and the authority competent to make that determination – Appropriate separation between conflicting functions.#Case C-236/24.

RSS
First24972498249925002502250425052506Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top