Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0213_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 April 2025.#E. T. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej we Wrocławiu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny we Wrocławiu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 9(1) – Concepts of ‘taxable person’ and ‘economic activity’ – Sale of agricultural land for residential development – Preparation for sale by an agent acting as a professional trader – Statutory joint ownership of assets between co-owning spouses.#Case C-213/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0215: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Ministério Público v YX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Objective of social rehabilitation – Residence of the convicted person – Enforcement of that sentence by the executing State in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Suspension of the enforcement of a custodial sentence ordered by

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0215_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Ministério Público v YX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA – European arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence – Article 4(6) – Ground for optional non-execution of the European arrest warrant – Objective of social rehabilitation – Residence of the convicted person – Enforcement of that sentence by the executing State in accordance with its domestic law – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Suspension of the enforcement of a custodial sentence ordere

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0218: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Felicísima v Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España, Sociedad Anónima Operadora, Sociedad Unipersonal and IATA España SLU.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage by air – Montreal Convention – Article 17(2) – Concept of ‘baggage’ – Article 22(2) – Air carrier liability in the event of loss of baggage – Loss of a passenger’s pet – Compensation for non-material damage.#Case C-218/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0218_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 October 2025.#Felicísima v Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España SA Operadora Unipersonal and IATA España SLU.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil n° 4 de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Carriage by air – Montreal Convention – Article 17(2) – Concept of ‘baggage’ – Article 22(2) – Air carrier liability in the event of loss of baggage – Loss of a passenger’s pet – Compensation for non-material damage.#Case C-218/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0219:           Arrêt de la Cour (dixième chambre) du 12 juin 2025.#A e.a. contre Tallinna linn.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique sociale – Protection de la sécurité et de la santé des travailleurs – Directive 89/391/CEE – Mesures visant à promouvoir l’amélioration de la sécurité et de la santé des travailleurs au travail – Articles 5, 6 et 9 – Obligations incombant aux employeurs – Directive 2000/54/CE – Protection des travailleurs contre les risques liés à l’exposition à des agents biologiques au travail – Article 14, paragraphe 3 – Surveillance médicale – Mise à disposition de vaccins efficaces – Annexe VII, points 1 et 2 – Réglementation nationale permettant à l’employeur de soumettre le travailleur exposé à un risque biologique à une obligation vaccinale – Virus SARS‑CoV‑2

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0219_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#A and Others v Tallinna linn.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Directive 89/391/EEC – Measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work – Articles 5, 6 and 9 – Obligations on employers – Directive 2000/54/EC – Protection of workers from risks related to exposure to biological agents at work – Article 14(3) – Health surveillance – Making available of effective vaccines – Annex VII, points 1 and 2 – National legislation allowing employers to require workers who are exposed to a biological risk to undergo vaccination – SARS-CoV-2 virus.#Case C-219/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0220: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Regia Autonomă Aeroportul Internaţional „Avram Iancu” Cluj v Consiliul Concurenţei.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Directive 96/67/EC – Access to the groundhandling market at EU airports – Article 1 – Scope – Airports whose annual traffic is less than two million passenger movements – Refusal of access to airport infrastructure at such an airport – Article 6 – Groundhandling for third parties – Applicability of the competition rules – Article 102 TFEU.#Case C-220/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0220_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Regia Autonomă Aeroportul Internaţional „Avram Iancu” Cluj v Consiliul Concurenţei.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Directive 96/67/EC – Access to the groundhandling market at EU airports – Article 1 – Scope – Airports whose annual traffic is less than two million passenger movements – Refusal of access to airport infrastructure at such an airport – Article 6 – Groundhandling for third parties – Applicability of the competition rules – Article 102 TFEU.#Case C-220/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0221: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Naturvårdsverket v UQ and IC.#References for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Waste – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Article 24(2) – Shipment – Take-back when a shipment is illegal – Take-back of the waste by the competent authority of dispatch – Obligation or possibility for that authority to recover or dispose of the waste despite opposition by the initial dispatcher – Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to property – Validity.#Joined Cases C-221/24 and C-222/24.

RSS
First24962497249824992501250325042505Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top