Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0200: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Directive 2000/31/EC – Electronic commerce – Article 8(1) – Commercial communications service provided by a member of a regulated profession – National legislation prohibiting advertising for pharmacies and pharmaceutical outlets as well as for the activities thereof – Restriction – Whether justified – Protection of public health.#Case C-200/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0200_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 56 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Directive 2000/31/EC – Electronic commerce – Article 8(1) – Commercial communications service provided by a member of a regulated profession – National legislation prohibiting advertising for pharmacies and pharmaceutical outlets as well as for the activities thereof – Restriction – Whether justified – Protection of public health.#Case C-200/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0202: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Minister for Justice and Equality v MA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for criminal prosecution – Competence of the executing judicial authority – Risk of breach of a fundamental right – Article 49(1) and Article 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Changes, to the detriment of that person, to the licence regime.#Case C-202/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0202_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Minister for Justice and Equality v MA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for criminal prosecution – Competence of the executing judicial authority – Risk of breach of a fundamental right – Article 49(1) and Article 52(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law – Changes, to the detriment of that person, to the licence regime.#Case C-202/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0203: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#KN v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 13(1) – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(8) and (10) – Worker normally employed in several Member States – Pursuit of less than 25 % of the activity in the Member State of residence – Concept of ‘substantial part of the activity’ – Connecting factors relating to working time and/or remuneration – Consideration of other circumstances – Length of the assessment period – Discretion of the competent institutions.#Case C-203/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0203_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#KN v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Legislation applicable – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 13(1) – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(8) and (10) – Worker normally employed in several Member States – Pursuit of less than 25% of the activity in the Member State of residence – Concept of ‘substantial part of the activity’ – Connecting factors relating to working time and/or remuneration – Consideration of other circumstances – Length of the assessment period – Discretion of the competent institutions.#Case C-203/24.

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0206: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#YX and Logistica i Gestió Caves Andorranes i Vidal SA v Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance and Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Regulation (EEC) No 1430/79 – Customs duties collected in infringement of EU law – Third subparagraph of Article 2(2) – Conditions for repayment on their own initiative – Finding that those duties were wrongly collected before the expiry of a period of three years from the date on which they were entered in the accounts – Finding that the national customs authorities are aware of the identity of the operators concerned and of the amount to be repaid t

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0206_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#YX and Logistica i Gestió Caves Andorranes i Vidal SA v Ministre de l’Économie, des Finances et de la Relance and Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Repayment or remission of import or export duties – Regulation (EEC) No 1430/79 – Customs duties collected in infringement of EU law – Third subparagraph of Article 2(2) – Conditions for repayment on their own initiative – Finding that those duties were wrongly collected before the expiry of a period of three years from the date on which they were entered in the accounts – Finding that the national customs authorities are aware of the identity of the operators concerned and of the amount to be repa

0 0

CELEX:62024CJ0209: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 March 2026.#VP v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training.#Appeal – Civil service – Member of the temporary staff – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted in compliance with a judgment of the General Court of the European Union annulling a decision not to renew a contract for an indefinite period and ordering compensation for the damage caused – Action for annulment and claim for compensation – Distortion of evidence in the file – Article 151(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request that a document be removed from the case file – Confidentiality of communications between lawyers – Scope.#Case C-209/24 P.

RSS
First24922493249424952497249925002501Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top