Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0776: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Article 108(3) TFEU – Tax scheme – Corporate tax provisions enabling companies that are tax resident in Spain to amortise the financial goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in companies that are tax resident outside that Member State – Decisions of the European Commission classifying those provisions as a State aid scheme and ordering the recovery of the aid, with the exception of aid relating to direct and indirect shareholdings acquired before a certain date set by the Commission in order to protect legitimate expectations – Subsequent Commission decision ordering the recovery of all aid relating to indirect shareholdings –

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0776_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain and Others.#Appeal – State aid – Article 108(3) TFEU – Tax scheme – Corporate tax provisions enabling companies that are tax resident in Spain to amortise the financial goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in companies that are tax resident outside that Member State – Decisions of the European Commission classifying those provisions as a State aid scheme and ordering the recovery of the aid, with the exception of aid relating to direct and indirect shareholdings acquired before a certain date set by the Commission in order to protect legitimate expectations – Subsequent Commission decision ordering the recovery of all aid relating to indirect shareholdin

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0781: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2024.#Malmö Motorrenovering AB v Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 250 – Temporary admission procedure – Article 251 – Period during which goods imported under that procedure may remain – Period insufficient for achieving the objective of authorised use – Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with that period – Conditions for extending that period – Importation of a racing car.#Case C-781/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0781_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 December 2024.#Malmö Motorrenovering AB v Allmänna ombudet hos Tullverket.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 250 – Temporary admission procedure – Article 251 – Period during which goods imported under that procedure may remain – Period insufficient for achieving the objective of authorised use – Customs debt incurred through non-compliance with that period – Conditions for extending that period – Importation of a racing car.#Case C-781/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0782: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 May 2025.#„Tauritus“ UAB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Method for determining the customs value – Article 70 – Transaction value – Goods imported on the basis of a provisional purchase price – Definitive price dependent on various factors not known on the date of acceptance of the customs declaration.#Case C-782/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0782_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 May 2025.#„Tauritus“ UAB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Union Customs Code – Method for determining the customs value – Article 70 – Transaction value – Goods imported on the basis of a provisional purchase price – Definitive price dependent on various factors not known on the date of acceptance of the customs declaration.#Case C-782/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0783: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Liège Airport Security v État belge, représenté par le Ministre de l’Intérieur.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 – Civil aviation security – Article 4 – Common basic standards – Article 9 – Appropriate authority – Member State’s obligation to designate a single authority to be responsible for the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of safety standards – Scope – National authority responsible for ensuring compliance with national regulations governing the exercise of private safety activities.#Case C-783/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0783_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 July 2025.#Liège Airport Security v État belge, représenté par le Ministre de l’Intérieur.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 300/2008 – Civil aviation security – Article 4 – Common basic standards – Article 9 – Appropriate authority – Member State’s obligation to designate a single authority to be responsible for the coordination and monitoring of the implementation of safety standards – Scope – National authority responsible for ensuring compliance with national regulations governing the exercise of private safety activities.#Case C-783/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0784: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#OÜ Voore Mets and AS Lemeks Põlva v Keskkonnaamet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Directive 2009/147/EC – Conservation of wild birds – Article 5 – Prohibitions to ensure the protection of birds – Article 9 – Derogations – Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Prohibition on felling trees during the period of bird breeding and rearing.#Case C-784/23.

RSS
First21262127212821292131213321342135Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top