november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0759_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 June 2025.#PJ Carroll & Company Ltd and Nicoventures Trading Ltd v The Minister for Health and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Irlande).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public health – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 7(12) – Article 11(6) – Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 – Validity – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products – Delegation of power to the European Commission – Novel tobacco products – Heated tobacco products – Power to withdraw exemptions from prohibitions of flavourings and labelling requirements – Substantial change of circumstances.#Case C-759/23.
oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0760: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#„EVN Bulgaria Toplofikatsia“ EAD v OZ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Energy – Promotion of energy efficiency – Directive 2012/27/EU – Article 9(3) – Transparency and accuracy of accounting for the consumption of thermal energy by the common parts – Failure to take into account the actual amount of heat supplied to each dwelling – Algorithm for allocating the cost of thermal energy consumption in co-owned buildings.#Case C-760/23.
december 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0760_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#„EVN Bulgaria Toplofikatsia“ EAD v OZ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Plovdiv.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Energy – Promotion of energy efficiency – Directive 2012/27/EU – Article 9(3) – Transparency and accuracy of accounting for the consumption of thermal energy by the common parts – Failure to take into account the actual amount of heat supplied to each dwelling – Algorithm for allocating the cost of thermal energy consumption in co-owned buildings.#Case C-760/23.
junij 05, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0762: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#RL and Others v Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment of severance pay to judges and prosecutors upon retirement – Suspension and cancellation of that payment for reasons connected to the need to eliminate a budget deficit – Article 2 TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislature and executive of Member States to reduce judges’ remuneration – Conditions.#Case C-762/23.
oktober 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0762_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 June 2025.#RL and Others v Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment of severance pay to judges and prosecutors upon retirement – Suspension and cancellation of that payment for reasons connected to the need to eliminate a budget deficit – Article 2 TEU – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislature and executive of Member States to reduce judges’ remuneration – Conditions.#Case C-762/23.
september 11, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0764: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Cairo Network Srl and Others v Ministero delle Imprese e del Made in Italy and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic communications networks and services – Directives 2002/20/EC, 2002/21/EC and 2002/77/EC – Rights to use digital terrestrial broadcasting radio frequencies for radio and television – Conversion of rights of use – Granting of rights of use – Judicial protection – Independence of national regulatory authorities.#Joined Cases C-764/23 to C-766/23.
marec 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0767: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 March 2026.#A. M. v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Scope of the obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Exceptions to that obligation – Obligation to state reasons for the concrete application of those exceptions – National legislation conferring on the national court or tribunal of last instance the power to dismiss actions by means of a summary statement of reasons – Conditions required to reason a refusal to make a reference for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-767/23.
marec 24, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0767_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 24 mars 2026.#A. M. contre Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 267 TFUE – Portée de l’obligation de renvoi préjudiciel des juridictions nationales statuant en dernier ressort – Exceptions à cette obligation – Obligation de motiver l’application concrète de ces exceptions – Réglementation nationale conférant à la juridiction nationale statuant en dernier ressort la faculté de rejeter des recours au moyen d’une motivation sommaire – Conditions requises pour motiver un refus de procéder à un renvoi préjudiciel.#Affaire C-767/23. This document does not exist in English.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0769: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa and Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services.#Case C-769/23.
december 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0769_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl contre Ministero della Difesa et Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Passation de marchés publics – Marchés mixtes comportant des aspects ayant trait à la défense – Services directement liés à des équipements militaires – Directive 2009/81/CE – Directive 2014/24/UE – Détermination de la directive applicable – Critères d’attribution du marché – Article 67, paragraphe 2, troisième alinéa, de la directive 2014/24/UE – Interdiction d’utiliser le prix comme seul critère d’attribution – Proportionnalité – Marchés publics de services à forte intensité de main-d’œuvre.#Affaire C-769/23. This document does not exist in English.