Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0672: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#Electricity & Water Authority of the Government of Bahrain and Others v Prysmian Netherlands BV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Special jurisdiction – Article 8(1) – Multiple defendants – Claims so closely connected that there is an interest in hearing and determining them together – Concept of ‘so closely connected’ – Concept of ‘anchor defendant’ – Infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Directive 2014/104/EU – Compensation for damage caused by a cartel – Concept of an undertaking – Liability of the parent company and a su

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0674: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#AEON NEPREMIČNINE, d.o.o. and Others v Državni zbor Republike Slovenije.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 15(2) and (3) – Fixed maximum tariffs – Provider of property intermediation services – National legislation laying down a maximum limit on the commission charged for intermediation services relating to the sale or rental of immovable property by a natural person – Proportionality – Articles 16 and 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Consumer protection.#Case C-674/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0674_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#AEON NEPREMIČNINE d.o.o. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ustavno sodišče.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom of establishment – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 15(2) and (3) – Fixed maximum tariffs – Provider of property intermediation services – National legislation laying down a maximum limit on the commission charged for intermediation services relating to the sale or rental of immovable property by a natural person – Proportionality – Articles 16 and 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Consumer protection.#Case C-674/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0677: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 January 2025.#A. B. and F. B. v Slovenská sporiteľňa, a.s.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Credit agreements for consumers – Directive 2008/48/EC – Requirements relating to information to be included in such a credit agreement – Duty to provide information – Duration of the agreement – Annual percentage rate of charge (APRC) – Assumptions used in order to calculate the APRC.#Case C-677/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0678: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#JU v Spitalul Clinic de Pneumoftiziologie Iaşi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 89/391/EEC – Safety and health of workers at work – Article 9 – Employers’ obligations – Classification of workplaces according to whether they are exposing workers to risk factors to their safety and health – Article 11(6) – Proceedings before the authority responsible for safety and health protection at work – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-678/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0678_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#JU v Spitalul Clinic de Pneumoftiziologie Iaşi.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Iaşi.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Directive 89/391/EEC – Safety and health of workers at work – Article 9 – Employers’ obligations – Classification of workplaces according to whether they are exposing workers to risk factors to their safety and health – Article 11(6) – Proceedings before the authority responsible for safety and health protection at work – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-678/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0679: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#WS and Others v European Border and Coast Guard Agency.#Appeal – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 – European integrated border management of the external borders of the European Union – European Border and Coast Guard – European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) – Frontex’s obligations to protect fundamental rights – Joint return operation coordinated by Frontex – Frontex’s non-contractual liability – Causal link between the breach of such obligations and the damage suffered.#Case C-679/23 P.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0679_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 18 décembre 2025.#WS e.a. contre Agence européenne de garde-frontières et de garde-côtes.#Pourvoi – Politique commune en matière d’asile et d’immigration – Règlement (UE) 2016/1624 – Gestion européenne intégrée des frontières extérieures de l’Union européenne – Corps européen de garde-frontières et de garde-côtes – Agence européenne de garde-frontières et de garde-côtes (Frontex) – Obligations incombant à Frontex en matière de protection des droits fondamentaux – Opération de retour conjointe coordonnée par Frontex – Responsabilité extracontractuelle de Frontex – Lien de causalité entre la violation de telles obligations et le préjudice subi.#Affaire C-679/23 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0680: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 December 2024.#Modexel – Consultores e Serviços SA v Autoridade Tributária e Assuntos Fiscais da Região Autónoma da Madeira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – First paragraph of Article 183 – Rules governing the exercise of the right of deduction – Carrying forward excess VAT – Concept of ‘following period’ – Refund of excess VAT – Cessation of economic activity.#Case C-680/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0681: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Mikail Safarbekovich Gutseriev v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus – Decision 2012/642/CFSP – Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to and transit through the territory of the European Union – Inclusion and maintenance of the appellant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Criterion of benefit from or support for the Lukashenko regime.#Case C-681/23 P.

RSS
First21182119212021212123212521262127Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top