Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0657_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 April 2025.#M. K. v Ministerstvo zemědělství.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – Financing, management and monitoring of the CAP – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Financing by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Article 54 – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Article 3 – Recovery of amounts wrongly paid of a grant – Limitation period – Indicative time limit.#Case C-657/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0662: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v X.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 4(1) and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) – Procedures for granting international protection – Extension by the determining authority of the six-month examination period – Large number of applications for international protection lodged simultaneously – Concept – Consideration of other circumstances.#Case C-662/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0662_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid v X.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 4(1) and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) – Procedures for granting international protection – Extension by the determining authority of the six-month examination period – Large number of applications for international protection lodged simultaneously – Concept – Consideration of other circumstances.#Case C-662/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0664: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#Caisse d’allocations familiales des Hauts-de-Seine v TX.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2011/98/EU – Rights of third-country workers who hold a single permit – Article 12 – Right to equal treatment – Social security – National legislation determining entitlements to family benefits – Legislation excluding the taking into account of the minor children of the single permit holder for lack of evidence that they have entered the national territory lawfully.#Case C-664/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0665: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#IL v Veracash SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Directive 2007/64/EC – Article 56(1)(b) – Obligation for the payment service user to notify the payment service provider ‘without undue delay’ of the loss, theft, misappropriation or unauthorised use of his or her payment instrument – Article 58 – Notification of unauthorised payment transactions – Rectification of such a transaction by the payment service provider subject to the obligation for the user of those services to notify that transaction ‘without undue delay … and no later than 13 months after the debit date’ – Articles 60 and 61 – Respective liabilities of the payment service provider and of the payer for un

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0665_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#IL v Veracash SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Payment services in the internal market – Directive 2007/64/EC – Article 56(1)(b) – Obligation for the payment service user to notify the payment service provider ‘without undue delay’ of the loss, theft, misappropriation or unauthorised use of his or her payment instrument – Article 58 – Notification of unauthorised payment transactions – Rectification of such a transaction by the payment service provider subject to the obligation for the user of those services to notify that transaction ‘without undue delay … and no later than 13 months after the debit date’ – Articles 60 and 61 – Respective liabilities of the payment service provider and of the payer fo

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0666: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#CM and DS v Volkswagen AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Approval of motor vehicles – Directive 2007/46/EC – Article 18(1) – Article 26(1) – Article 46 – Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 – Article 5(2) – Motor vehicles – Diesel engine – Pollutant emissions – Reduction in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ – Defeat device – Protection of the interests of an individual purchaser of a vehicle equipped with an unlawful defeat device – Installation of that device after the vehicle’s entry into service – Right to compensation from the vehicle manufacturer on the basis of tortious liability – Ground for exemption – Unavoidable error on the part of the manufacturer as

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0666_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#CM and DS v Volkswagen AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Ravensburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Approval of motor vehicles – Directive 2007/46/EC – Article 18(1) – Article 26(1) – Article 46 – Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 – Article 5(2) – Motor vehicles – Diesel engine – Pollutant emissions – Reduction in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions limited by a ‘temperature window’ – Defeat device – Protection of the interests of an individual purchaser of a vehicle equipped with an unlawful defeat device – Installation of that device after the vehicle’s entry into service – Right to compensation from the vehicle manufacturer on the basis of tortious liability – Ground

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0671: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#M v Lietuvos bankas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering and terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Article 59 – Concept of ‘systematic infringement’ – Penalties – National legislation or national practice allowing a separate fine to be imposed in respect of each infringement established in the course of one and the same investigation – Compatibility with EU law – Minimum harmonisation – Observance of the general principles of EU law – Effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions – Principle ne bis in idem.#Case C-671/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0671_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#M v Lietuvos bankas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering and terrorist financing – Directive (EU) 2015/849 – Article 59 – Concept of ‘systematic infringement’ – Penalties – National legislation or national practice allowing a separate fine to be imposed in respect of each infringement established in the course of one and the same investigation – Compatibility with EU law – Minimum harmonisation – Observance of the general principles of EU law – Effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions – Principle ne bis in idem.#Case C-671/23.

RSS
First21172118211921202122212421252126Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top