oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0294: Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 23 octobre 2025.#République de Bulgarie contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique agricole commune (PAC) – Fonds européen agricole de garantie (FEAGA) et Fonds européen agricole pour le développement rural (Feader) – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2021/261 – Dépenses exclues du financement de l’Union européenne – Dépenses effectuées par la République de Bulgarie – Règlement (UE) no 1306/2013 – Article 52 – Procédure d’apurement de conformité – Article 54 – Paiements indus résultant d’irrégularités ou de négligences – Absence de recouvrement par l’État membre concerné – Rapport d’enquête de l’Office européen de lutte antifraude (OLAF).#Affaire C-294/23 P. This document does not exist in English.
marec 27, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0294_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Republic of Bulgaria v European Commission.#Appeal – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/261 – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the Republic of Bulgaria – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 52 – Conformity clearance procedure – Article 54 – Undue payments following the occurrence of irregularity or negligence – No recovery by the Member State concerned – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) investigation report.#Case C-294/23 P.
december 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0295: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#Halmer Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft UG v Rechtsanwaltskammer München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Establishing the applicable freedom – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 15 – Requirements relating to holding shares in a firm – A purely financial investor’s holding in a law firm – Revocation of that law firm’s registration with the professional body on account of that holding – Restriction on freedom of establishment and on the free movement of capital – Justifications based on protecting the independence of lawyers and recipients of legal services – Necessity – Proportionality.#Case C-29
december 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0295_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#Halmer Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft UG v Rechtsanwaltskammer München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Establishing the applicable freedom – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 15 – Requirements relating to holding shares in a firm – A purely financial investor’s holding in a law firm – Revocation of that law firm’s registration with the professional body on account of that holding – Restriction on freedom of establishment and on the free movement of capital – Justifications based on protecting the independence of lawyers and recipients of legal services – Necessity – Proportionality.#Case
junij 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0296: Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 20 juin 2024.#Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV contre dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co.KG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Produits biocides – Règlement (UE) no 528/2012 – Article 72 – Désinfectant contenant des produits biocides – Restrictions de la publicité – Notion de “toute autre indication similaire” – Objectif d’assurer un niveau élevé de protection de la santé humaine et animale ainsi que de l’environnement.#Affaire C-296/23. This document does not exist in English.
februar 21, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0296_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 June 2024.#Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV v dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co.KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 72 – Disinfectant containing biocidal products – Advertising restrictions – Concept of ‘any similar indication’ – Purpose of ensuring a high level of protection of both human and animal health and the environment.#Case C-296/23.
november 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0297: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 November 2024.#Harley-Davidson Europe Ltd and Neovia Logistics Services International v European Commission.#Appeal – Common commercial policy – Measures to ensure the exercise by the European Union of its rights under international trade rules – Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/886 – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Decisions relating to binding origin information (BOI) adopted by national customs authorities – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Determination of the non-preferential origin of certain Harley-Davidson motorcycles – Concept of ‘processing or working operations which are not economically justified’ – Implementing decision of the European Commissi
avgust 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0297_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 November 2024.#Harley-Davidson Europe Ltd and Neovia Logistics Services International v European Commission.#Appeal – Common commercial policy – Measures to ensure the exercise by the European Union of its rights under international trade rules – Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/886 – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Decisions relating to binding origin information (BOI) adopted by national customs authorities – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Determination of the non-preferential origin of certain Harley-Davidson motorcycles – Concept of ‘processing or working operations which are not economically justified’ – Implementing decision of the European Comm
junij 19, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0299: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone de Belgique and Others v État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive (EU) 2016/801 – Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for study purposes – Article 34(5) – Appeal against a decision rejecting an application for admission to the territory of a Member State for study purposes – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-299/23.
oktober 24, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0299_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone de Belgique and Others v État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive (EU) 2016/801 – Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for study purposes – Article 34(5) – Appeal against a decision rejecting an application for admission to the territory of a Member State for study purposes – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-299/23.