september 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0256: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#European Chemicals Agency v Hallertauer Hopfenveredelungsges. m.b.H. and B. GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 299 TFEU – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 – Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (REACH) – Article 94(1) – Regulation (EC) No 340/2008 – First subparagraph of Article 11(3) and third subparagraph of Article 13(4) – Fees due to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Fee for registration of a substance – Reduction granted to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – Verification by ECHA of the declaration relating to the size of the enterprise in question – Failure to provide certain information within the prescribed period – ECHA decision demanding payment
julij 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0258: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2026.#IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência.#References for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of a dominant position – Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Implementation by the national competition authorities – Decision of a national competition authority ordering an inspection – Search of the premises of the undertakings concerned – Seizure of business records resulting from email communications – Warrant issued by the Public Prosecutor’s Office – Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private life and communications – Right to the protection of personal data – Procedural re
julij 17, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0258_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (grande chambre) du 16 juillet 2026.#IMI – Imagens Médicas Integradas S.A. e.a. contre Autoridade da Concorrência.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Concurrence – Ententes – Abus de position dominante – Articles 101 et 102 TFUE – Mise en œuvre par les autorités nationales de concurrence – Décision d’une autorité nationale de concurrence ordonnant une inspection – Perquisition dans les locaux des entreprises concernées – Saisie de documents professionnels issus de communications par courrier électronique – Mandat émis par le ministère public – Articles 7 et 8 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Droit au respect de la vie privée et des communications – Droit à la protection des données personnelles – Exigences procédurales – Abse This document does not exist in English.
maj 31, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0261: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 May 2024.#Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics SAE and Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry SAE v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of certain woven and/or stitched glass fibre fabrics originating in the People’s Republic of China and Egypt – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/492 – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Calculation of the normal value – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 2(5) – Calculation of costs associated with the production and sale of a product under investigation on the basis of records of the party under investigation – Costs not reasonably reflected in records – Adjustment on the basis of the costs of other producers or exporters in the same country or on any other reasonable basis – European Commi
julij 09, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0261_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 May 2024.#Hengshi Egypt Fiberglass Fabrics SAE and Jushi Egypt for Fiberglass Industry SAE v European Commission.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of certain woven and/or stitched glass fibre fabrics originating in the People’s Republic of China and Egypt – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/492 – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Calculation of the normal value – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 2(5) – Calculation of costs associated with the production and sale of a product under investigation on the basis of records of the party under investigation – Costs not reasonably reflected in records – Adjustment on the basis of the costs of other producers or exporters in the same country or on any other reasonable basis – European C
oktober 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0262: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#UPL Europe Ltd and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV v European Commission.#Appeal – Plant protection products – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2087 – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance mancozeb – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Action for annulment.#Case C-262/23 P.
januar 25, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0262_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#UPL Europe Ltd and Indofil Industries (Netherlands) BV v European Commission.#Appeal – Plant protection products – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/2087 – Non-renewal of approval of the active substance mancozeb – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Action for annulment.#Case C-262/23 P.
september 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0264: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 September 2024.#Booking.com BV and Booking.com (Deutschland) GmbH v 25hours Hotel Company Berlin GmbH and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Agreements between undertakings – Contracts concluded between an online reservation platform and hoteliers – Price parity clauses – Ancillary restraint – Block exemption – Vertical agreements – Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 – Article 3(1) – Definition of the relevant market.#Case C-264/23.
september 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0264_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 September 2024.#Booking.com BV and Booking.com (Deutschland) GmbH v 25hours Hotel Company Berlin GmbH and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Agreements between undertakings – Contracts concluded between an online reservation platform and hoteliers – Price parity clauses – Ancillary restraint – Block exemption – Vertical agreements – Regulation (EU) No 330/2010 – Article 3(1) – Definition of the relevant market.#Case C-264/23.
julij 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0265: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2024.#Okrazhna prokuratura - Sliven v DM and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Fight against organised crime – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Articles 47 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Excessive length of the pre-trial stage of the criminal proceedings – Substantive infringements of procedural rules, but which are capable of being remedied, affecting the indictment – Right of the accused person to have the criminal proceedings against him or her brought to an end.#Case C-265/23.