Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0410: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#I. SA v S. J.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 2(b) – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Dual-purpose contract – Farmer concluding a contract for the purchase of a product intended for both agricultural and domestic use – Internal market for electricity – Directive 2009/72/EC – Article 3(7) – Annex I, paragraph 1 (a) – Household customer – Contract for the supply of electricity for a fixed period at a fixed price – Contractual penalty for early termination – National legislation limiting the amount of that penalty to the ‘costs and damages resulting from the contract’.#Case C-410/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0410_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 May 2025.#I. SA v S. J.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 2(b) – Concept of ‘consumer’ – Dual-purpose contract – Farmer concluding a contract for the purchase of a product intended for both agricultural and domestic use – Internal market for electricity – Directive 2009/72/EC – Article 3(7) – Annex I, paragraph 1 (a) – Household customer – Contract for the supply of electricity for a fixed period at a fixed price – Contractual penalty for early termination – National legislation limiting the amount of that penalty to the ‘costs and damages resulting from the contract

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0411: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#D. SA v P. SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation for passengers in the event of long delay or cancellation of flights – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Extraordinary circumstances – Reasonable preventive measures – Technical failures caused by a hidden design defect – Design defect affecting an aircraft engine – Obligation of the air carrier to have back-up aircraft.#Case C-411/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0411_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#D. SA v P. SA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Compensation for passengers in the event of long delay or cancellation of flights – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Extraordinary circumstances – Reasonable preventive measures – Technical failures caused by a hidden design defect – Design defect affecting an aircraft engine – Obligation of the air carrier to have back-up aircraft.#Case C-411/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0412:           Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 19 septembre 2024.#Commission européenne contre République slovaque.#Manquement d’État – Directive 2011/7/UE – Lutte contre le retard de paiement dans les transactions commerciales – Article 4, paragraphe 4, sous b) – Transactions commerciales entre entreprises et pouvoirs publics – Faculté reconnue aux États membres de prolonger jusqu’à un maximum de 60 jours civils le délai de paiement imparti aux entités publiques dispensant des soins de santé – Obligation pour les États membres de veiller à ce que ces entités publiques n’excèdent effectivement pas ce délai.#Affaire C-412/23.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0413: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 September 2025.#European Data Protection Supervisor v Single Resolution Board.#Appeal – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Procedure for granting compensation to shareholders and creditors of a banking institution following the resolution of that institution – Decision of the European Data Protection Supervisor finding that the Single Resolution Board failed to fulfil its obligations relating to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Article 15(1)(d) – Obligation to inform the data subject – Transmission of pseudonymised data to a third party – Article 3(1) – Concept of ‘personal data’ – Article 3(6) – Concept of ‘pseudonymisation’.#Case C-413/23 P.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0413_RES:           Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 4 septembre 2025.#Contrôleur européen de la protection des données contre Conseil de résolution unique.#Pourvoi – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel – Procédure de dédommagement des actionnaires et des créanciers d’un établissement bancaire à la suite de la résolution de celui-ci – Décision du Contrôleur européen de la protection des données constatant la violation par le Conseil de résolution unique de ses obligations relatives au traitement des données à caractère personnel – Règlement (UE) 2018/1725 – Article 15, paragraphe 1, sous d) – Obligation d’information de la personne concernée – Transmission de données pseudonymisées à un tiers – Article 3, point 1

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0414: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2025.#Metsä Fibre Oy v Energiavirasto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Union Registry – Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 – Record of a surrender of such allowances in that registry – Finality of transactions – Article 40 – Reversal of finalised processes – Article 70 – Surrender under a provision of EU law subsequently invalidated by the Court of Justice – Impossibility, for the operator, to recover the allowances concerned for the period in question – Validity.#Case C-414/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0414_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2025.#Metsä Fibre Oy v Energiavirasto.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading – Union Registry – Regulation (EU) No 389/2013 – Record of a surrender of such allowances in that registry – Finality of transactions – Article 40 – Reversal of finalised processes – Article 70 – Surrender under a provision of EU law subsequently invalidated by the Court of Justice – Impossibility, for the operator, to recover the allowances concerned for the period in question – Validity.#Case C-414/23.

RSS
First20442045204620472049205120522053Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top