julij 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0353_INF: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 February 2025.#Nouryon Performance Formulations BV, anciennement Nouryon Industrial Chemicals BV v European Commission.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Evaluation of registration dossiers – Request for further studies for the purposes of the evaluation of the registration dossier for dimethyl ether – Decision addressed to the registrant and contested by it before the General Court of the European Union – Subsequent replacement of the registrant at the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – Appeal brought by the new registrant – Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by an entity which was not a party to the proceedings before the General Court – Inadmi
junij 12, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0364: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil service – Interinstitutional transfer – Transfer application on the basis of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, submitted in response to a vacancy notice – Rejection of that application – Obligation to take account of the order of priority laid down in Article 29(1) of those regulations – Errors of law – Contradictory reasoning.#Case C-364/23 P.
november 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0364_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2025.#ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Civil service – Interinstitutional transfer – Transfer application on the basis of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, submitted in response to a vacancy notice – Rejection of that application – Obligation to take account of the order of priority laid down in Article 29(1) of those regulations – Errors of law – Contradictory reasoning.#Case C-364/23 P.
marec 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0365: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 March 2025.#SIA "A" v C and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Scope – Article 2(b) – Article 3(1) – Article 4(2) – Article 5 – Article 6(1) – Article 8a – Pre-formulated standard contract – Contract between a supplier providing services for development and career support for sportspersons and a ‘rising star’ sportsman of minor age represented by his parents – Term establishing the obligation to pay to that supplier remuneration equal to 10% of the income received by that sportsman over the following 15 years – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 17 and 24 – Right to property – Rights of the child.#Case C-365/23.
marec 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0365_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 March 2025.#SIA "A" v C and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Scope – Article 2(b) – Article 3(1) – Article 4(2) – Article 5 – Article 6(1) – Article 8a – Pre-formulated standard contract – Contract between a supplier providing services for development and career support for sportspersons and a ‘rising star’ sportsman of minor age represented by his parents – Term establishing the obligation to pay to that supplier remuneration equal to 10% of the income received by that sportsman over the following 15 years – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 17 and 24 – Right to property – Rights of the child.#Case C-365/23.
april 26, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0366: Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 25 avril 2024.#Compagnie industrielle de la matière végétale (CIMV) contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Recherche et développement technologique – Convention de subvention conclue dans le cadre du programme-cadre pour la recherche et l’innovation “Horizon 2020” – Recouvrement d’une créance – Remboursement échelonné – Exactitude matérielle des faits – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Obligation de motivation – Confiance légitime – Droit d’être entendu – Proportionnalité.#Affaire C-366/23 P. This document does not exist in English.
december 12, 2024 0 12 CELEX:62023CJ0366_INF: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#Compagnie industrielle de la matière végétale (CIMV) v European Commission.#Case C-366/23 P.
junij 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0367: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2024.#EA v Artemis security SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 9(1)(a) – Obligation to assess the health of night workers – Employer’s failure to comply with that obligation – Right to compensation – Need to establish the existence of specific harm.#Case C-367/23.
junij 21, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0367_RES: Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 20 juin 2024.#EA contre Artemis security SAS.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection de la sécurité et de la santé des travailleurs – Aménagement du temps de travail – Directive 2003/88/CE – Article 9, paragraphe 1, sous a) – Obligation d’évaluation de la santé des travailleurs de nuit – Violation de cette obligation par l’employeur – Droit à réparation – Nécessité d’établir l’existence d’un préjudice spécifique.#Affaire C-367/23. This document does not exist in English.
september 27, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0368: Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 26 septembre 2024.#Haute autorité de l’audit (H2A), anciennement H3C contre MO.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 267 TFUE – Notion de “juridiction” – Critères structurels et fonctionnels – Exercice de fonctions juridictionnelles ou administratives – Autorité publique indépendante de régulation et/ou de supervision des contrôleurs légaux des comptes – Modalités d’organisation interne – Pouvoir d’engager des procédures d’office – Pouvoir de sanction – Décisions susceptibles de faire l’objet d’un recours juridictionnel – Absence de qualité de “tiers” par rapport à l’autorité ayant adopté la décision faisant l’objet d’un recours juridictionnel – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire C-368/23. This document does not exist in English.