Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0295_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#Halmer Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft UG v Rechtsanwaltskammer München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Establishing the applicable freedom – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 15 – Requirements relating to holding shares in a firm – A purely financial investor’s holding in a law firm – Revocation of that law firm’s registration with the professional body on account of that holding – Restriction on freedom of establishment and on the free movement of capital – Justifications based on protecting the independence of lawyers and recipients of legal services – Necessity – Proportionality.#Case

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0296:           Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 20 juin 2024.#Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV contre dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co.KG.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Rapprochement des législations – Produits biocides – Règlement (UE) no 528/2012 – Article 72 – Désinfectant contenant des produits biocides – Restrictions de la publicité – Notion de “toute autre indication similaire” – Objectif d’assurer un niveau élevé de protection de la santé humaine et animale ainsi que de l’environnement.#Affaire C-296/23.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0296_SUM: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 June 2024.#Zentrale zur Bekämpfung unlauteren Wettbewerbs eV v dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co.KG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 72 – Disinfectant containing biocidal products – Advertising restrictions – Concept of ‘any similar indication’ – Purpose of ensuring a high level of protection of both human and animal health and the environment.#Case C-296/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0297: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 November 2024.#Harley-Davidson Europe Ltd and Neovia Logistics Services International v European Commission.#Appeal – Common commercial policy – Measures to ensure the exercise by the European Union of its rights under international trade rules – Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/886 – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Decisions relating to binding origin information (BOI) adopted by national customs authorities – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Determination of the non-preferential origin of certain Harley-Davidson motorcycles – Concept of ‘processing or working operations which are not economically justified’ – Implementing decision of the European Commissi

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0297_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 November 2024.#Harley-Davidson Europe Ltd and Neovia Logistics Services International v European Commission.#Appeal – Common commercial policy – Measures to ensure the exercise by the European Union of its rights under international trade rules – Regulation (EU) No 654/2014 – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/886 – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Decisions relating to binding origin information (BOI) adopted by national customs authorities – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 – Determination of the non-preferential origin of certain Harley-Davidson motorcycles – Concept of ‘processing or working operations which are not economically justified’ – Implementing decision of the European Comm

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0299: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone de Belgique and Others v État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive (EU) 2016/801 – Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for study purposes – Article 34(5) – Appeal against a decision rejecting an application for admission to the territory of a Member State for study purposes – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-299/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0299_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2025.#Ordre des barreaux francophones et germanophone de Belgique and Others v État belge, représenté par la Secrétaire d’État à l’Asile et la Migration.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Immigration policy – Directive (EU) 2016/801 – Conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for study purposes – Article 34(5) – Appeal against a decision rejecting an application for admission to the territory of a Member State for study purposes – Fundamental right to an effective judicial remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-299/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0300: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 December 2024.#NB v Kutxabank, SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Mortgage loan agreement – Term providing for a variable interest rate – Reference index based on the annual percentage rates of charge (APRC) of mortgage loans granted by savings banks – Official index established by a published administrative act – Information contained in the preamble to that act – Check relating to the requirement of transparency – Assessment of the unfair nature of the term – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-300/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0302: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#Marek Jarocki v C. J.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions – Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 – Article 25 – Electronic signatures – Legal effect and evidential value in legal proceedings – National legislation allowing the lodging with the courts, by electronic means, of procedural documents signed electronically – Need for those courts to have an appropriate ICT system.#Case C-302/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0304: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#European Commission v Republic of Malta.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Directive 91/271/EEC – Urban waste water treatment – Collecting systems for urban waste water in certain agglomerations – Article 4 – Secondary or equivalent treatment of urban waste water – Article 5 – Sensitive areas – More stringent treatment – Article 10 – Sufficient performance – Article 15 – Monitoring of the conformity of discharges with the requirements of Annex I.B – Control procedures laid down in Annex I.D – Maximum permitted number of samples which fail to conform.#Case C-304/23.

RSS
First20322033203420352037203920402041Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top