Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0289_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 November 2024.#Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria v A and and S.E.I v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 1 de Alicante and Juzgado de lo Mercantil no 10 de Barcelona.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Directive (EU) 2019/1023 – Procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt – Article 1(4) – Subject matter and scope – Extension of procedures to insolvent natural persons who are not entrepreneurs – Article 20 – Access to discharge of debt – Article 23(1), (2) and (4) – Derogations – Exclusion of specific categories of debt from discharge of debt – Natural person who

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0291: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2024.#LS v PL.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Article 10(1) – Subsidiary jurisdiction in matters of succession – Deceased person habitually resident in a third State at the time of death – Criterion of the location of the assets of the estate in a Member State – Decisive point in time – Assessment at the time of death.#Case C-291/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0291_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2024.#LS v PL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction in civil matters – Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 – Article 10(1) – Subsidiary jurisdiction in matters of succession – Deceased person habitually resident in a third State at the time of death – Criterion of the location of the assets of the estate in a Member State – Decisive point in time – Assessment at the time of death.#Case C-291/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0292: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 April 2025.#Criminal proceedings against I.R.O. and F.J.L.R.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Article 42(1) – Procedural measures intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review, by national courts, in accordance with the requirements and procedures provided for in national law – Scope – Witness summons – National law not permitting direct judicial review of such a measure – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness.#Case C-292/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0292_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 8 April 2025.#Criminal proceedings against I.R.O. and F.J.L.R.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Article 42(1) – Procedural measures intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review, by national courts, in accordance with the requirements and procedures provided for in national law – Scope – Witness summons – National law not permitting direct judicial review of such a measure – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principles of equivalence and effectiveness.#Case C-292/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0293: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2024.#ENGIE Deutschland GmbH v Landesregulierungsbehörde beim Sächsischen Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft, Arbeit und Verkehr.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Points 28 and 29 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘distribution’ – Concept of ‘distribution system operator’ – Concept of ‘distribution system’ – Articles 30 to 39 – Distribution system operation – Undertaking operating an energy facility comprising a combined heat and power plant and an electric wiring system, supplying heat, hot water and electricity to the tenants of a residential complex – Simultaneous sale of the electricity generated – National legislation exempting the operator of such a facility f

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0293_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 November 2024.#ENGIE Deutschland GmbH v Landesregulierungsbehörde beim Sächsischen Staatsministerium für Wirtschaft, Arbeit und Verkehr.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Points 28 and 29 of Article 2 – Concept of ‘distribution’ – Concept of ‘distribution system operator’ – Concept of ‘distribution system’ – Articles 30 to 39 – Distribution system operation – Undertaking operating an energy facility comprising a combined heat and power plant and an electric wiring system, supplying heat, hot water and electricity to the tenants of a residential complex – Simultaneous sale of the electricity generated –

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0294:           Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 23 octobre 2025.#République de Bulgarie contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Politique agricole commune (PAC) – Fonds européen agricole de garantie (FEAGA) et Fonds européen agricole pour le développement rural (Feader) – Décision d’exécution (UE) 2021/261 – Dépenses exclues du financement de l’Union européenne – Dépenses effectuées par la République de Bulgarie – Règlement (UE) no 1306/2013 – Article 52 – Procédure d’apurement de conformité – Article 54 – Paiements indus résultant d’irrégularités ou de négligences – Absence de recouvrement par l’État membre concerné – Rapport d’enquête de l’Office européen de lutte antifraude (OLAF).#Affaire C-294/23 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0294_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#Republic of Bulgaria v European Commission.#Appeal – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/261 – Expenditure excluded from EU financing – Expenditure incurred by the Republic of Bulgaria – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 52 – Conformity clearance procedure – Article 54 – Undue payments following the occurrence of irregularity or negligence – No recovery by the Member State concerned – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) investigation report.#Case C-294/23 P.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0295: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#Halmer Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft UG v Rechtsanwaltskammer München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 49 TFEU – Freedom of establishment – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Establishing the applicable freedom – Services in the internal market – Directive 2006/123/EC – Article 15 – Requirements relating to holding shares in a firm – A purely financial investor’s holding in a law firm – Revocation of that law firm’s registration with the professional body on account of that holding – Restriction on freedom of establishment and on the free movement of capital – Justifications based on protecting the independence of lawyers and recipients of legal services – Necessity – Proportionality.#Case C-29

RSS
First20312032203320342036203820392040Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top