september 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0086: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#E.N.I. and Y.K.I. v HUK-COBURG-Allgemeine Versicherung AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Law applicable to non-contractual obligations – Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 – Article 16 – Overriding mandatory provisions – Road traffic accident – Rights to compensation recognised in respect of the family members of the deceased person – Principle of fairness for the purposes of compensation for non-material damage suffered – Assessment criteria.#Case C-86/23.
september 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0086_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 September 2024.#E.N.I. and Y.K.I. v HUK-COBURG-Allgemeine Versicherung AG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Law applicable to non-contractual obligations – Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 – Article 16 – Overriding mandatory provisions – Road traffic accident – Rights to compensation recognised in respect of the family members of the deceased person – Principle of fairness for the purposes of compensation for non-material damage suffered – Assessment criteria.#Case C-86/23.
julij 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0087: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Biedrība „Latvijas Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas asociācija” v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supply of services for consideration – Article 9(1) – Concepts of ‘taxable person’ and ‘economic activity’ – Non-profit association carrying out projects financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Supply of training services through subcontractors – Inclusion of the amount of the subsidy in the taxable amount – Article 73.#Case C-87/23.
junij 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0087_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 July 2024.#Biedrība 'Latvijas Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas asociācija' v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supply of services for consideration – Article 9(1) – Concepts of ‘taxable person’ and ‘economic activity’ – Non-profit association carrying out projects financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Supply of training services through subcontractors – Inclusion of the amount of the subsidy in the taxable amount – Article 73.#Case C-87/23.
september 20, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0088: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 September 2024.#Parfümerie Akzente GmbH v KTF Organisation AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic commerce – Information society services – Directive 2000/31/EC – Coordinated field – Article 2(h) – Online promotion and sale of cosmetic products – Exclusion from the coordinated field of labelling obligations applicable to products promoted and sold by an information society service provider – Directive 75/324/EEC – Article 8(2) – Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 – Article 19(5) – Option for the Member State of destination to enforce use of a language of its choice.#Case C-88/23.
marec 06, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0088_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 September 2024.#Parfümerie Akzente GmbH v KTF Organisation AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea Hovrätt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Electronic commerce – Information society services – Directive 2000/31/EC – Coordinated field – Article 2(h) – Online promotion and sale of cosmetic products – Exclusion from the coordinated field of labelling obligations applicable to products promoted and sold by an information society service provider – Directive 75/324/EEC – Article 8(2) – Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 – Article 19(5) – Option for the Member State of destination to enforce use of a language of its choice.#Case C-88/23.
april 19, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0089: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#Companhia União de Crédito Popular SARL v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Scope – Economic activity – Supply of services – Article 135 – Exemptions for other activities – Granting of credit – Sale by auction of pledged goods – Single supply – Distinct and independent supplies – Ancillary or principal supplies.#Case C-89/23.
februar 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0089_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 April 2024.#Companhia União de Crédito Popular SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Scope – Economic activity – Supply of services – Article 135 – Exemptions for other activities – Granting of credit – Sale by auction of pledged goods – Single supply – Distinct and independent supplies – Ancillary or principal supplies.#Case C-89/23.
maj 22, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0090: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 May 2025.#Trasta Komercbanka AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 24 – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation for access to the activities of a credit institution – Administrative review procedure – Action for annulment.#Case C-90/23 P.
september 15, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62023CJ0090_INF: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 May 2025.#Trasta Komercbanka AS v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Article 24 – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation for access to the activities of a credit institution – Administrative review procedure – Action for annulment.#Case C-90/23 P.