Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0048_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 March 2025.#Alajärven Sähkö Oy e.a. and Elenia Verkko Oyj v Energiavirasto.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Article 57(4) and (5) – Independence of national regulatory authority in the exercise of its duties and powers – Policy guidelines issued by a Member State – Legislative amendment aimed at reducing electricity distribution prices – Decision concerning methods for monitoring electricity system operation charges taken by the regulatory authority concerned following that amendment – Account taken of the travaux préparatoires relating to the law that introduced that amendment.#Case C-48/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0051_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Validity Foundation - Mental Disability Advocacy Centre v European Commission.#Appeal – Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(3) – Access to documents drawn up by an institution for internal use or relating to a matter where a decision has not been taken by that institution – Documents relating to a draft call for proposals co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Decision refusing access to documents originating from a Member State – Decision granting access to those documents, adopted after the action for annulment of the decision refusing access was brought – No interest in bringing proceedings.#Case C-51/23 P.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0053: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Asociaţia “Forumul Judecătorilor din România” and Asociaţia “Mişcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor” v Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Procurorul General al României.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Article 19(1) TEU – Cooperation and Verification Mechanism – Benchmarks subscribed to by Romania – Fight against corruption – Investigations of offences committed within the judicial system – Action challenging the nomination of prosecutors with competence to conduct those investigations – Standing of professional associations of judges to bring proceedings.#Case C-53/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0053_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Asociaţia “Forumul Judecătorilor din România” and Asociaţia “Mişcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor” v Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Procurorul General al României.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Article 19(1) TEU – Cooperation and Verification Mechanism – Benchmarks subscribed to by Romania – Fight against corruption – Investigations of offences committed within the judicial system – Action challenging the nomination of prosecutors with competence to conduct those investigations – Standing of professional associations of judges to bring proceedings.#Case C-53/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0054: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#WY v Laudamotion GmbH and Ryanair DAC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1) – Article 7(1) – Compensation for air passengers in the event of a long delay to a flight – Loss of time – Replacement flight booked by the passenger – Passenger arriving at the final destination less than three hours later than the original scheduled arrival time – No compensation.#Case C-54/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0054_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#WY v Laudamotion GmbH and Ryanair DAC.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(1) – Article 7(1) – Compensation for air passengers in the event of a long delay to a flight – Loss of time – Replacement flight booked by the passenger – Passenger arriving at the final destination less than three hours later than the original scheduled arrival time – No compensation.#Case C-54/23.

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0057: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#JH v Policejní prezidium.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of their personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Minimisation of data processing – Storage limitation of personal data – Article 10 – Collection and storage of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 6(a) – Obligation to make a distinction between personal data of different categories of p

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0057_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#JH v Policejní prezidium.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of their personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Minimisation of data processing – Storage limitation of personal data – Article 10 – Collection and storage of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 6(a) – Obligation to make a distinction between personal data of different categories of persons – National legislation which provides for the collecti

0 0

CELEX:62023CJ0059: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Republic of Austria v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(3)(c) and Article 108 TFEU – Aid planned for the development of two new nuclear reactors at the site at Paks (Hungary) – Direct award of the construction contract – Directive 2014/25/EU – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market subject to compliance with certain commitments – Compliance of the aid with EU law other than State aid law – Object of the aid – Aspects that are inextricably linked to the aid – Parallel conduct of infringement proceedings – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-59/23 P.

RSS
First20062007200820092011201320142015Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top