junij 01, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0690: Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 24 mai 2023.#Shortcut – Consultadoria e Serviços de Tecnologias de Informação, Lda contre Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Système commun de taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Article 178, sous a) – Droit à déduction – Modalités d’exercice – Article 226, point 6 – Mentions devant obligatoirement figurer sur la facture – Étendue et nature des services rendus – Factures comportant une description générique des services fournis.#Affaire C-690/22. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 28, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0690_INF: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 May 2023.#Shortcut – Consultadoria e Serviços de Tecnologias de Informação, Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Case C-690/22.
februar 08, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0702: Beschluss des Gerichtshofs vom 1. Februar 2023.#Okan Balaban gegen Amt der Europäischen Union für geistiges Eigentum.#Rechtsmittel – Unionsmarke – Zulassung von Rechtsmitteln – Art. 170b der Verfahrensordnung des Gerichtshofs – Antrag, in dem die Bedeutsamkeit einer Frage für die Einheit, die Kohärenz oder die Entwicklung des Unionsrechts nicht dargetan wird – Nichtzulassung des Rechtsmittels.#Rechtssache C-702/22 P. This document does not exist in English.
marec 08, 2023 0 93 CELEX:62022CO0702_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 1 February 2023.#Okan Balaban v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case C-702/22 P.
maj 17, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0712: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#WT v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand – Action for annulment and for damages – Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded.#Case C-712/22 P.
avgust 28, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0712_INF: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#WT v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty in the form of a reprimand – Action for annulment and for damages – Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded.#Case C-712/22 P.
julij 04, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0720: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 June 2023.#QN v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Appraisal report – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part.#Case C-720/22 P.
september 27, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0720_INF: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 June 2023.#QN v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Appraisal report – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Action for annulment and for damages – Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part.#Case C-720/22 P.
marec 30, 2023 0 2 CELEX:62022CO0732: Order of the Court of 23 March 2023.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-732/22 P.
junij 22, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CO0732_INF: Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 23 March 2023.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-732/22 P.