november 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0579: Case T-579/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – ClientEarth v Commission (Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Bioenergy activities – Forest biomass – Manufacture of organic base chemicals – Manufacture of plastics in primary form – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation – Article 10 of Regulation 2020/852 – Transitional activities – Quantitative threshold – Conclusive scientific evidence – Life cycle – Precautionary principle – Principle of do no significant harm to environmental objectives – Article 17 of Regulati
marec 25, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0581: Case T-581/22: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2024 — ECE Group GmbH v EUIPO — ECE Piknik Ürünleri Plastik ve Kömür Üretim Ithalat Ihracat (ECE QUALITY OF LIFE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark ECE QUALITY OF LIFE — Earlier national figurative mark ECE — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
november 03, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0583: Case T-583/22: Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2025 – Fédération environnement durable and Others v Commission (Environment – Aarhus Convention – Rejection of a request for internal review – Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 – Electricity generation from wind power – Taxonomy – Requirements for technical screening criteria – Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 – Substantial contribution to climate change mitigation – Substantial contribution to climate change adaptation – No significant harm to other environmental objectives)
september 18, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0585: Case T-585/22: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Trus v EUIPO — Unilab (ARTRESAN) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark ARTRESAN — Genuine use of the mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
november 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0587: Case T-587/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – Crown Holdings and Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure)
november 25, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0589: Case T-589/22: Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2024 – Silgan Holdings and Others v Commission (Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure)
april 02, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0591: Case T-591/22: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2024 — Polaroid IP v EUIPO — Klimeck (Representation of a square placed inside a rectangle) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark representing a square placed inside a rectangle — Absolute ground for invalidity — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
januar 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0592: Case T-592/22: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2023 — Liquid Advertising v EUIPO — Liqui.do (Liquid+Arcade) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Liquid+Arcade — Earlier EU figurative mark LIQUI.DO — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
april 28, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0596: Case T-596/22: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2025 – PGI Spain and Others v Commission (State aid – Measure to reduce wholesale electricity prices in the Iberian Peninsula – Energy crisis – Decision not to raise objections – No serious difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Proportionality – Legitimate expectations)
avgust 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022TA0597: Case T-597/22: Judgment of the General Court of 3 July 2024 – Sophienwald v EUIPO – Zalto Glas (Sw Sophienwald) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Sw Sophienwald – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))