maj 17, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0695_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 May 2024.#Fondee a.s. v Česká národní banka.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Markets in financial instruments – Directive 2014/65/EU – Article 3 – Exemption from the application of Directive 2014/65/EU – Exempted investment intermediary – Legislation of a Member State prohibiting that intermediary from transmitting clients’ orders to an investment firm established in another Member State.#Case C-695/22.
junij 14, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0696: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#C SPRL v AJFP Cluj and DGRFP Cluj-Napoca.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 64(1) and (2) – Applicability – Services of court-appointed administrators and liquidators – Continuous supply of services – Article 168(a) – Deduction of input VAT – Expenditure relating to the right to use a trade name – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard.#Case C-696/22.
februar 21, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0696_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#C SPRL v contreAdministrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice (AJFP) Cluj and Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice (DGRFP) Cluj-Napoca.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 64(1) and (2) – Applicability – Services of court-appointed administrators and liquidators – Continuous supply of services – Article 168(a) – Deduction of input VAT – Expenditure relating to the right to use a trade name – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard.#Case C-696/22.
julij 30, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0697: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Koiviston Auto Helsinki Oy, anciennement Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) – Relevant issue post-dating the publication of the decision initiating the formal investigation procedure – Identification of the beneficiary of the aid – Obligation to publish an amending opening decision – Right of the beneficiary of the aid to submit comments – Essential procedural requirement – Incompatibility with the internal market – Recovery of the aid ordered by the European Commission – Amount to be recovered – Competence of the Member State concerned.#Case C-697/22 P.
avgust 01, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0697_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 July 2024.#Koiviston Auto Helsinki Oy, anciennement Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) – Relevant issue post-dating the publication of the decision initiating the formal investigation procedure – Identification of the beneficiary of the aid – Obligation to publish an amending opening decision – Right of the beneficiary of the aid to submit comments – Essential procedural requirement – Incompatibility with the internal market – Recovery of the aid ordered by the European Commission – Amount to be recovered – Competence of the Member State concerned.#Case C-697/22 P.
december 07, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0700: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 December 2023.#RegioJet a. s. and STUDENT AGENCY k.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Existing aid and new aid – Aid granted in disregard of the procedural rules laid down in Article 108(3) TFEU – Expiry of the limitation period provided for in Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Obligation on the national court to order the recovery of the aid.#Case C-700/22.
julij 23, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0700_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 December 2023.#RegioJet a. s. and STUDENT AGENCY k.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Existing aid and new aid – Aid granted in disregard of the procedural rules laid down in Article 108(3) TFEU – Expiry of the limitation period provided for in Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Obligation on the national court to order the recovery of the aid.#Case C-700/22.
oktober 18, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0701: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 October 2024.#SC AA SRL v MFE.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Article 60 – Principle of sound financial management – Article 80 – Right of beneficiaries to receive payments as soon as possible and in full – Right to obtain interest for late payment – Principles of effectiveness and equivalence – Termination of an ERDF financing contract on account of irregularities in its performance – Annulment of that termination – Correction of the irregularities – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Directive 2011/7/EU – Scope.#Case C-701/22.
marec 22, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0703: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#WU v Directie van het Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen (CBR).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Road transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Conditions for issue or renewal – Minimum standards for physical and mental fitness – Eyesight – Point 6.4 of Annex III – Principle of proportionality – Person not meeting the field of vision requirement – Favourable opinion on fitness to drive issued by medical experts – Discretion in an individual case failing an express exception.#Case C-703/22.
december 11, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0703_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2024.#WU v Directie van het Centraal Bureau Rijvaardigheidsbewijzen (CBR).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Road transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Conditions for issue or renewal – Minimum standards for physical and mental fitness – Eyesight – Point 6.4 of Annex III – Principle of proportionality – Person not meeting the field of vision requirement – Favourable opinion on fitness to drive issued by medical experts – Discretion in an individual case failing an express exception.#Case C-703/22.