Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0652_RES: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 October 2024.#Kolin Inşaat Turizm Sanayi ve Ticaret AȘ v Državna komisija za kontrolu postupaka javne nabave.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement in the European Union – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 43 – Economic operators of a third country which has not concluded an international agreement with the European Union which guarantees access to public procurement in a reciprocal and equal manner – No right on the part of those economic operators to ‘no less favourable’ treatment – Participation of such an economic operator in a public procurement procedure – Inapplicability of Directive 2014/25 – Inadmissibility in the context of an action brought by that economic operator seeking a request for a prelimin

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0653: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#J. P. Mali Kerékpárgyártó és Forgalmazó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Customs union – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Article 42(1) – Obligation on the Member States to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties for failure to comply with the customs legislation – Incorrect declaration of the country of origin of the imported goods – National legislation providing for a fine corresponding to 50% of the shortfall in customs duties – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-653/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0654: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 April 2024.#FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de voedselketen & Leefmilieu v Triferto Belgium NV.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Article 2(1)(b) – Scope – Article 3(10) and (11) – Concepts of ‘import’ and ‘importer’ – Article 6 – Obligation to register – Person assuming responsibility for registration – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Customs warehousing.#Case C-654/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0654_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 April 2024.#FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de voedselketen & Leefmilieu v Triferto Belgium NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank van eerste aanleg Oost-Vlaanderen Afdeling Gent.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals – Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) – Article 2(1)(b) – Scope – Article 3(10) and (11) – Concepts of ‘import’ and ‘importer’ – Article 6 – Obligation to register – Person assuming responsibility for registration – Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 – Union Customs Code – Customs warehousing.#Case C-654/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0655:           Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Neunte Kammer) vom 14. Dezember 2023.#I GmbH & Co. KG gegen Hauptzollamt HZA.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Landwirtschaft – Gemeinsame Marktorganisation – Zuckersektor – Produktionsabgaben – Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1360/2013 – Erstattung zu Unrecht gezahlter Abgaben – Ausschluss- und Verjährungsfristen – Bestandskraft von Festsetzungsbescheiden – Grundsätze der Äquivalenz und der Effektivität – Grundsatz der Rechtssicherheit.#Rechtssache C-655/22.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0656_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 January 2024.#Askos Properties EOOD v Zamestnik izpalnitelen direktor na Darzhaven fond 'Zemedelie'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy (CAP) – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Rural development support measures – Regulation (EC) No 1974/2006 – Lease or letting agreement – Lease agreement concluded between a municipal authority and an aid beneficiary – Commitments over five years – Termination of the lease agreement further to a legislative amendment – Obligation to reimburse the aid received in part or in full – Not possible to adapt those commitments to a new situation for the holdi

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0657: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#SC Bitulpetrolium Serv SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Prahova – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Ploieşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation in accordance with the principle of actual use of those products – Annex I – Minimum levels of taxation applicable to energy products provided for by that directive – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(a) – Chargeable event – Article 63 – Chargeability of VAT – Article 78(1)(a) – Taxable amount – Reintroduction of energy products into the tax warehouse – Conditions imposed by national law – Additional excise duty and VA

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0657_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 April 2024.#SC Bitulpetrolium Serv SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Prahova – Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Ploieşti.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Prahova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Directive 2003/96/EC – Taxation in accordance with the principle of actual use of those products – Annex I – Minimum levels of taxation applicable to energy products provided for by that directive – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(a) – Chargeable event – Article 63 – Chargeability of VAT – Article 78(1)(a) – Taxable amount – Reintroduction of energy products into the tax warehouse –

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0660: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 February 2024.#Ente Cambiano società cooperativa per azioni v Agenzia delle Entrate.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 63 TFEU – Free movement of capital – Directive 2008/7/EC – Cooperative credit banks having net assets above a certain threshold – National legislation obliging those banks to pay an amount equal to 20% of those net assets in order to transfer their banking business to a public limited company in exchange for securities of that company – Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Requirement to provide reasons justifying the need for an answer from the Court – Purely internal situation – Inadmissibility.#Case C-660/22.

RSS
First15441545154615471549155115521553Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top