Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0367_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Air Canada v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of air freight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Single and continuous infringement – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Limitation period for the

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0369: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Société Air France SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Calculation of the fine – Mitigating circumstance – Taking into account of regulatory regimes in

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0369_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Société Air France SA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Calculation of the fine – Mitigating circumstance – Taking into account of regulatory regimes

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0370: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Air France-KLM v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Parent company and subsidiaries – Attributability of unlawful conduct – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Calculation of the fine – Mitiga

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0370_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 February 2026.#Air France-KLM v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for airfreight – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport – Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, and refusal to pay commission on surcharges) – Parent company and subsidiaries – Attributability of unlawful conduct – Inbound freight services – Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission – Qualified effects – Calculation of the fine – Mi

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0371:           Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 11 janvier 2024.#G sp. z o.o. contre W S.A.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Marché intérieur de l’électricité – Directive 2009/72/CE – Article 3, paragraphes 5 et 7 – Protection des consommateurs – Droit de changer de fournisseur – Client non résidentiel – Contrat de fourniture d’électricité à durée déterminée et à prix fixe conclu avec une petite entreprise – Pénalité contractuelle pour résiliation anticipée – Réglementation nationale limitant le montant de cette pénalité aux “coûts et indemnités résultant du contenu du contrat”.#Affaire C-371/22.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0371_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#G sp. z o.o. v W S.A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market in electricity – Directive 2009/72/EC – Article 3(5) and (7) – Consumer protection – Right to switch supplier – Non-household customer – Fixed-term, fixed-price electricity supply contract concluded with a small undertaking – Contractual penalty for early termination – National legislation limiting the amount of that penalty to the ‘costs and damages resulting from the contract’.#Case C-371/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0372: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#CM v DN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in the matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 9 and 15 – Continuing jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State of the child’s former habitual residence following the child having moved – Concept of ‘moving’ – Application for modification of a decision relating to access rights – Calculation of the time limit within which such an application must be submitted – Transfer of the case to a court of the Member State of the child’s new habitual residence, better placed to hear the case.#Case C-372/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0372_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 April 2023.#CM v DN.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and in the matters of parental responsibility – Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 – Articles 9 and 15 – Continuing jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State of the child’s former habitual residence following the child having moved – Concept of ‘moving’ – Application for modification of a decision relating to access rights – Calculation of the time limit within which such an application must be submitted – Transfer of the case to a court of the Member State of the child’s new habitual residence, better placed to hear the case.#Case C-372/22.

RSS
First15151516151715181520152215231524Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top