Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0255: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 26 September 2024.#Orlen S.A., anciennement Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen S.A., anciennement Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Gas markets of Central and Eastern Europe – Article 102 TFEU – Article 54 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Abuse of dominant position – Upstream gas supplies in Central and Eastern Europe – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 9(1) – Decision of the European Commission to make binding the individual commitments proposed by an undertaking – Action for annulment – Adequacy of those commitments in the light of the competition concerns identified in the statement of objections – Nature of the EU Courts’ power of review – Commission decisio

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0256: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act.#Case C-256/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0256_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 February 2024.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Appeal – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) – Withdrawal of authorisation – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Representation of a party – Authority to act granted to the lawyer – Representative not lawfully provided with authority to act.#Case C-256/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0257: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 3(2) – Concept of ‘illegal stay’ – Directive 2013/32/EU – Applicant for international protection – Article 9(1) – Right to remain in the Member State pending the examination of the application – Return decision adopted before the adoption of the first-instance decision rejecting the application for international protection.#Case C-257/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0257_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 November 2023.#CD v Ministerstvo vnitra České republiky, Odbor azylové a migrační politiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 3(2) – Concept of ‘illegal stay’ – Directive 2013/32/EU – Applicant for international protection – Article 9(1) – Right to remain in the Member State pending the examination of the application – Return decision adopted before the adoption of the first-instance decision rejecting the application for international protection.#Case C-257/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0258: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2023.#Finanzamt Hannover-Nord v H Lebensversicherung.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Free movement of capital – Article 63 TFEU – Business tax – Calculation of the basis of assessment for that tax – Rules for calculation – Dividends from holdings of less than 10% in the capital of resident and non-resident capital companies – Inclusion in the basis of assessment for business tax – Time of the inclusion – Difference in treatment – Restriction – None.#Case C-258/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0259: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 June 2023.#Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Plant protection products – Active substance – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Article 4(5) – Article 14(1) – Article 20(1) – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Article 12(3) – Article 14(1) – Non-renewal of the approval of the active substance thiram for the purpose of placing it on the market – Rights of the defence – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment.#Case C-259/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0259_INF: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 June 2023.#Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Plant protection products – Active substance – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 – Article 4(5) – Article 14(1) – Article 20(1) – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Article 12(3) – Article 14(1) – Non-renewal of the approval of the active substance thiram for the purpose of placing it on the market – Rights of the defence – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment.#Case C-259/22 P.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0260: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH v Corint Media GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 2(e) – Broadcasting organisations – Reproduction right of fixations of broadcasts – Article 5(2)(b) – Private copying exception – Fair compensation – Harm to broadcasting organisations – Equal treatment – National legislation excluding broadcasting organisations from the right to fair compensation.#Case C-260/22.

0 0

CELEX:62022CJ0260_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 November 2023.#Seven.One Entertainment Group GmbH v Corint Media GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Erfurt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 2(e) – Broadcasting organisations – Reproduction right of fixations of broadcasts – Article 5(2)(b) – Private copying exception – Fair compensation – Harm to broadcasting organisations – Equal treatment – National legislation excluding broadcasting organisations from the right to fair compensation.#Case C-260/22.

RSS
First15011502150315041506150815091510Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top