januar 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0231: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#État belge v Autorité de protection des données.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Point 7 of Article 4 – Concept of ‘controller’ – Official journal of a Member State – Obligation to publish as they stand company documents prepared by companies or their legal representatives – Article 5(2) – Successive processing of the personal data contained in such documents by several separate persons or entities – Determination of responsibilities.#Case C-231/22.
junij 04, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0231_RES: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#État belge v Autorité de protection des données.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d'appel de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Point 7 of Article 4 – Concept of ‘controller’ – Official journal of a Member State – Obligation to publish as they stand company documents prepared by companies or their legal representatives – Article 5(2) – Successive processing of the personal data contained in such documents by several separate persons or entities – Determination of responsibilities.#Case C-2
junij 29, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0232: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 June 2023.#Cabot Plastics Belgium SA v État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 44 – Place of supply of services – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2011 – Article 11(1) – Provision of services – Point of reference for tax purposes – Concept of ‘fixed establishment’ – Suitable structure in terms of human and technical resources – Ability to receive and use the services for the fixed establishment’s own needs – Provision of tolling services and ancillary services – Exclusive contractual undertaking between a company providing services in a Member State and the company receiving those services established in a third State – Legally independent companies.#Case C-232
marec 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0234: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 March 2024.#Roheline Kogukond MTÜ and Others v Keskkonnaagentuur.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Right of access to environmental information – Exceptions – Data relating to the location of permanent sample plots used to draw up a forest inventory.#Case C-234/22.
februar 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0234_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 March 2024.#Roheline Kogukond MTÜ and Others v Keskkonnaagentuur.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tallinna Halduskohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Directive 2003/4/EC – Right of access to environmental information – Exceptions – Data relating to the location of permanent sample plots used to draw up a forest inventory.#Case C-234/22.
oktober 05, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0237: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Mylan IRE Healthcare Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Orphan medicinal products – Articles 3 and 8 – Concept of ‘significant benefit’ – Concept of ‘clinical superiority’ – Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 – Article 3 – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Tobramycin VVB – Period of market exclusivity of Tobi Podhaler, containing the active substance tobramycin – Derogation from that market exclusivity.#Case C-237/22 P.
marec 07, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0237_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Mylan IRE Healthcare Ltd v European Commission.#Appeal – Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Orphan medicinal products – Articles 3 and 8 – Concept of ‘significant benefit’ – Concept of ‘clinical superiority’ – Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 – Article 3 – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Tobramycin VVB – Period of market exclusivity of Tobi Podhaler, containing the active substance tobramycin – Derogation from that market exclusivity.#Case C-237/22 P.
oktober 26, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0238: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Achte Kammer) vom 26. Oktober 2023.#FW gegen LATAM Airlines Group SA.#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Luftverkehr – Verordnung (EG) Nr. 261/2004 – Art. 2 Buchst. j – Art. 3 – Art. 4 Abs. 3 – Ausgleichsleistungen für Fluggäste im Fall der Nichtbeförderung – Fluggast, der im Voraus über die Nichtbeförderung unterrichtet wurde – Keine Verpflichtung des Fluggasts, sich am Flugsteig einzufinden – Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c – Ausnahmen vom Ausgleichsanspruch bei Annullierung eines Fluges – Unanwendbarkeit dieser Ausnahmen bei vorweggenommener Beförderungsverweigerung.#Rechtssache C-238/22. This document does not exist in English.
marec 14, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0238_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 October 2023.#FW v LATAM Airlines Group SA.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(j) – Article 3 – Article 4(3) – Compensation of air passengers in the event of denied boarding – Passenger informed in advance that boarding would be denied – No obligation for the passenger to present him or herself for boarding – Article 5(1)(c) – Exceptions to the right to compensation in the event of a flight cancellation – Inapplicability of those exceptions in the event of a pre-emptive denial of boarding.#Case C-238/22.
marec 09, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0239: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#État belge and Promo 54 v Promo 54 and État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 12(1) and (2) – Supply, before first occupation, of a building or parts of a building and of the land on which the building stands – No provisions in national law providing for detailed rules for applying the criterion relating to first occupation – Article 135(1)(j) – Exemptions – Supply, after conversion, of a building which was the subject of a first occupation before the conversion – National administrative legal commentary treating buildings which have undergone substantial conversions in the same way as new buildings.#Case C-239/22.