oktober 25, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0240: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 October 2024.#European Commission v Intel Corporation Inc.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Loyalty rebates – Characterisation as abuse – Strategy aiming to exclude competitors that are at least as efficient as the dominant undertaking from the market.#Case C-240/22 P.
oktober 25, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0240_RES: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 October 2024.#European Commission v Intel Corporation Inc.#Appeal – Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Microprocessors market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement – Loyalty rebates – Characterisation as abuse – Strategy aiming to exclude competitors that are at least as efficient as the dominant undertaking from the market.#Case C-240/22 P.
avgust 01, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0242: Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 1er août 2022.#TL contre Ministério Público.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Procédure préjudicielle d’urgence – Coopération judiciaire en matière pénale – Directive 2010/64/UE – Droit à l’interprétation et à la traduction – Article 2, paragraphe 1, et article 3, paragraphe 1 – Notion de “document essentiel” – Directive 2012/13/UE – Droit à l’information dans le cadre des procédures pénales – Article 3, paragraphe 1, sous d) – Champ d’application – Absence de transposition en droit national – Effet direct – Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Article 47 et article 48, paragraphe 2 – Convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales – Article 6 – Condamnation à une peine de pri This document does not exist in English.
avgust 07, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0242_RES: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 August 2022.#Criminal proceedings against TL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Évora.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2010/64/EU – Right to interpretation and translation – Article 2(1) and Article 3(1) – Concept of an ‘essential document’ – Directive 2012/13/EU – Right to information in criminal proceedings – Article 3(1)(d) – Scope – Not implemented in domestic law – Direct effect – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 and Article 48(2) – European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Article 6 – Suspended prison sentence with probatio
september 14, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0246: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 September 2023.#Staatsanwaltschaft Köln and Bundesamt für Güterverkehr v BW.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport operations – Combined transport of goods between Member States – Directive 92/106/EEC – International carriage of goods by road – Regulation (EC) No 1072/2009 – Transport of empty containers before loading or after unloading of goods in the context of combined transport – Non-applicability of the provisions relating to cabotage operations.#Case C-246/22.
oktober 26, 2023 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0249: Urteil des Gerichtshofs (Fünfte Kammer) vom 26. Oktober 2023.#BM gegen Gebühren Info Service GmbH (GIS).#Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Gemeinsames Mehrwertsteuersystem – Richtlinie 2006/112/EG – Art. 2 Abs. 1 Buchst. c – Dienstleistung, die gegen Entgelt erbracht wird – Begriff – Tätigkeiten einer öffentlichen Rundfunk- und Fernsehanstalt, die durch eine gesetzliche Gebühr finanziert werden, die von Personen gezahlt wird, die ein Radio-oder Fernsehgerät besitzen, das sich an einem terrestrisch versorgten Standort befindet – Art. 378 Abs. 1 und Anhang X Teil A Nr. 2 – Beitrittsakte der Republik Österreich – Ausnahme – Anwendungsbereich.#Rechtssache C-249/22. This document does not exist in English.
marec 17, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0249_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 October 2023.#BM v Gebühren Info Service GmbH (GIS).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 2(1)(c) – Supply of services for consideration – Concept – Activities of a public radio and television body financed by a compulsory fee paid by persons in possession of a radio and television receiver in the terrestrial broadcasting area – Article 378(1) and point 2 of Part A of Annex X – Act of accession of the Republic of Austria – Derogation – Scope.#Case C-249/22.
februar 01, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0251: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 February 2024.#Scania AB and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Truck market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Agreements and concerted practices in relation to the prices of trucks, the timing for the introduction of emission technologies required by Euro 3 to Euro 6 standards and the passing on of the costs of those technologies to customers – Single and continuous infringement – Geographic scope of that infringement – ‘Hybrid procedure’ leading successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision at the end of a standard procedure – Article 41 of the Ch
januar 12, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0252: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD v Consiliul Judeţean Suceava and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Article 9(3) to (5) – Access to justice – Law firm partnership – Action seeking to challenge administrative measures – Admissibility – Conditions laid down by national law – No impairment of a right or undermining of a legitimate interest – Not prohibitively expensive judicial proceedings – Allocation of costs – Criteria.#Case C-252/22.
februar 20, 2025 0 0 CELEX:62022CJ0252_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 11 January 2024.#Societatea Civilă Profesională de Avocaţi AB & CD v Consiliul Judeţean Suceava and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Târgu-Mureş.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Aarhus Convention – Article 9(3) to (5) – Access to justice – Law firm partnership – Action seeking to challenge administrative measures – Admissibility – Conditions laid down by national law – No impairment of a right or undermining of a legitimate interest – Not prohibitively expensive judicial proceedings – Allocation of costs – Criteria.#Case C-252/22.