marec 27, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62021TO0428: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 March 2026.#Ivan Fursin and Others v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-428/21.
maj 19, 2026 0 0 CELEX:62021TO0428_INF: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 March 2026.#Ivan Fursin and Others v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Material damage – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-428/21.
junij 08, 2022 0 174 CELEX:62021TO0431: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 March 2022.#Union nationale des indépendants solidaires (UNIS) v European Commission.#Case T-431/21.
junij 16, 2022 0 174 CELEX:62021TO0431_INF: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 March 2022.#Union nationale des indépendants solidaires (UNIS) v European Commission.#Case T-431/21.
junij 08, 2022 0 161 CELEX:62021TO0434: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#TO v European Environment Agency.#Case T-434/21.
julij 05, 2022 0 155 CELEX:62021TO0434_INF: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#TO v European Environment Agency.#Case T-434/21.
junij 08, 2022 0 160 CELEX:62021TO0442: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Rhiannon Thomas and Michaël Julien v Council of the European Union.#Case T-442/21.
julij 05, 2022 0 163 CELEX:62021TO0442_INF: Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 February 2022.#Rhiannon Thomas and Michaël Julien v Council of the European Union.#Case T-442/21.
junij 24, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TO0449: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 June 2022.#Natixis v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Preliminary issue – Lack of representation by a lawyer authorised to practise solely before the courts or tribunals of the United Kingdom in one of the situations exhaustively provided for by Article 91(2) of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union and from Euratom – Lack of representation by a lawyer authorised to practise before the courts or tribunals of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the EEA Agreement – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union.#Case T-449/21.
avgust 08, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TO0449_RES: Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 20 June 2022.#Natixis v European Commission.#Action for annulment – Preliminary issue – Lack of representation by a lawyer authorised to practise solely before the courts or tribunals of the United Kingdom in one of the situations exhaustively provided for by Article 91(2) of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union and from Euratom – Lack of representation by a lawyer authorised to practise before the courts or tribunals of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the EEA Agreement – Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union.#Case T-449/21.