Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0427: Case C-427/22, BG (Grant of loans without approval): Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 November 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven kasatsionen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against BG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential requirements for credit institutions — Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Points 1 and 42 of Article 4(1) — Definitions — Concepts of ‘credit institution’ and ‘authorisation’ — Grant of loans without approval)

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0430: Joined Cases C-430/22 and C-468/22, VB (information for a person convicted in absentia) and Another: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 June 2023 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against VB (C-430/22), VB (C-468/22) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive (EU) 2016/343 — Article 8(4) — Right to be present at the trial — Proceedings conducted in absentia — Reopening of the proceedings — Notice to the person convicted in absentia of his or her right to have the proceedings reopened)

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0431: Case C-431/22, Scuola europea di Varese: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 December 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Scuola europea di Varese v PD, as person exercising parental responsibility over NG, LC, as person exercising parental responsibility over NG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Convention defining the Statute of the European Schools — Article 27(2) — General Rules of the European Schools — Articles 62, 66 and 67 — Challenge to the decision of a Class Council not to authorise a pupil to be promoted to the year above in the secondary school — Lack of jurisdiction of the national courts — Sole jurisdiction of the Complaints Board of the European Schools — Effective judicial protection)

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0432: Case C-432/22, PT (Agreement concluded between the prosecutor and the perpetrator of an offence): Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad – Bulgaria) – Criminal proceedings against PT (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Criminal offences and penalties in the field of illicit drug trafficking and the fight against organised crime – Possibility to reduce applicable penalties – Scope – Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA – Articles 4 and 5 – Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA – Articles 3 and 4 – National legislation not implementing EU law – Article 51(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Europea

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0433: Case C-433/22, HPA — Construções: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira v HPA — Construções SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Annex IV — Point 2 — Temporary provisions for particular labour-intensive services — Reduced rate of VAT applicable to the renovation and repairing of private dwellings — Definition of ‘private dwellings’)

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0434: Case C-434/22, Latvijas valsts meži: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 December 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — ‘Latvijas valsts meži’ AS v Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde, Vides pārraudzības valsts birojs (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora — Directive 92/43/EEC — Article 6(3) — Concept of ‘plan or project’ on a protected site — Intervention in a forest to protect it from fire — Need to carry out a prior assessment of the implications of that intervention for the site concerned)

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0435: Case C-435/22 PPU: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 28 October 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against HF (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 50 — Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement — Article 54 — Principle ne bis in idem — Extradition agreement between the European Union and the United States of America — Extradition of a third-country national to the United States under a bilateral treaty concluded by a Member State — National who has been convicted by final judgment for the same acts and has served his sentence in full in another M

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0436: Case C-436/22, ASCEL: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 July 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Castilla y León – Spain) – Asociación para la Conservación y Estudio del Lobo Ibérico (ASCEL) v Administración de la Comunidad de Castilla y León (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Directive 92/43/EEC – Articles 2, 4, 11, 12, 14, 16 and 17 – System of strict protection for animal species – Canis lupus (wolf) – Cynegetic exploitation – Assessment of the conservation status of populations of the species concerned – Conservation status of that species unfavourable-poor – Exploitation incompatible with the maintenance or restoration of the species at a favourab

0 0

CELEX:62022CA0438: Case C-438/22, Em akaunt BG: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 January 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad — Bulgaria) — Em akaunt BG ЕООD v Zastrahovatelno aktsionerno druzhestvo Armeets AD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 101 TFEU — Setting of minimum fee amounts by a lawyers’ professional organisation — Decision by an association of undertakings — Court prohibited from ordering reimbursement of fees in an amount less than those minimum amounts — Restriction of competition — Justifications — Legitimate objectives — Quality of the services provided by the lawyers — Implementation of the judgment of 23 November 2017, CHEZ Elektro Bulgaria and FrontEx Int

RSS
First14171418141914201422142414251426Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top