Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0216_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 December 2023.#Ryanair DAC and Malta Air ltd. v European Commission.#State aid – Aid granted by France to Air France in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – State guarantee for a bank loan and a subordinated loan by the State – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Substantial adverse effect on the applicant’s position on the market – Admissibility – Determination of the beneficiary of the aid in the context of a group of companies.#Case T-216/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0217:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 7 septembre 2022.#SB contre Agence de l'Union européenne pour la gestion opérationnelle des systèmes d’information à grande échelle au sein de l’espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice.#Fonction publique – Agents contractuels – Personnel de l’eu-LISA – Décision de licenciement à l’issue de la période de stage – Obligation de motivation – Conditions normales de stage – Droit d’être entendu – Irrégularités procédurales – Devoir de sollicitude – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Principe de bonne administration.#Affaire T-217/21.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0217_INF:           Arrêt du Tribunal (huitième chambre) du 7 septembre 2022.#SB contre Agence de l'Union européenne pour la gestion opérationnelle des systèmes d’information à grande échelle au sein de l’espace de liberté, de sécurité et de justice.#Fonction publique – Agents contractuels – Personnel de l’eu-LISA – Décision de licenciement à l’issue de la période de stage – Obligation de motivation – Conditions normales de stage – Droit d’être entendu – Irrégularités procédurales – Devoir de sollicitude – Erreur manifeste d’appréciation – Principe de bonne administration.#Affaire T-217/21.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0222: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2022 (Extracts).#Shopify Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – EU figurative mark Shoppi – Earlier EU word mark SHOPIFY – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom (Brexit).#Case T-222/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0222_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2022 (Extracts).#Shopify Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – EU figurative mark Shoppi – Earlier EU word mark SHOPIFY – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom (Brexit).#Case T-222/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0223: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 5 July 2023.#SE v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Contract of employment – Article 2(b) of the CEOS – Rejection of an application – Promotion – Reclassification – New contract – Expiry of the contract – Article 8, second paragraph, and Article 10(3) of the CEOS – Error of law – Equal treatment – Action for annulment – Admissibility.#Case T-223/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021TJ0223_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 5 July 2023.#SE v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Contract of employment – Article 2(b) of the CEOS – Rejection of an application – Promotion – Reclassification – New contract – Expiry of the contract – Article 8, second paragraph, and Article 10(3) of the CEOS – Error of law – Equal treatment – Action for annulment – Admissibility.#Case T-223/21.

RSS
First13391340134113421344134613471348Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top