oktober 12, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0524: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 October 2022 (Extracts).#Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Commission correspondence with AstraZeneca and the German authorities concerning the quantity of COVID-19 vaccines and their delivery times – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Documents having been produced in the context of court proceedings that were closed at the time of adoption of the decision refusing access to those documents – Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests of a third party.#Case T-524/21.
avgust 06, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0524_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 October 2022 (Extracts).#Hans-Wilhelm Saure v European Commission.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Commission correspondence with AstraZeneca and the German authorities concerning the quantity of COVID-19 vaccines and their delivery times – Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings – Documents having been produced in the context of court proceedings that were closed at the time of adoption of the decision refusing access to those documents – Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests of a third party.#Case T-524/21.
december 21, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0525: Arrêt du Tribunal (deuxième chambre élargie) du 21 décembre 2022.#E. Breuninger GmbH & Co. contre Commission européenne.#Recours en annulation – Aides d’État – Régime-cadre visant à établir en Allemagne un régime fédéral d’indemnisation du préjudice subi par les décisions de confinement – Décision de ne pas soulever d’objections – Mesure destinée à remédier aux dommages causés par les calamités naturelles ou par d’autres événements extraordinaires – Absence d’intérêt à agir – Irrecevabilité.#Affaire T-525/21. This document does not exist in English.
avgust 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0525_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 21 December 2022.#E. Breuninger GmbH & Co. v European Commission.#Action for annulment – State aid – Framework scheme to establish a federal compensation scheme in Germany for losses caused by lockdown decisions – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or other exceptional occurrences – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-525/21.
september 07, 2023 0 41 CELEX:62021TJ0526: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 September 2023.#Mikail Safarbekovich Gutseriev v Council of the European Union.#Case T-526/21.
maj 03, 2024 0 13 CELEX:62021TJ0526_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 September 2023.#Mikail Safarbekovich Gutseriev v Council of the European Union.#Case T-526/21.
januar 19, 2023 0 79 CELEX:62021TJ0528: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 January 2023.#Neratax LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-528/21.
april 25, 2023 0 69 CELEX:62021TJ0528_INF: Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 18 January 2023.#Neratax LTD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Case T-528/21.
december 14, 2022 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0530: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 December 2022 (Extracts).#Pierre Lannier v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a mirror image combination of the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ – Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Locus standi – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-530/21.
avgust 03, 2024 0 0 CELEX:62021TJ0530_RES: Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 December 2022 (Extracts).#Pierre Lannier v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ – Earlier EU figurative mark representing a mirror image combination of the superposed capital letters ‘P’ and ‘L’ – Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Locus standi – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-530/21.