Search
× Search

Baza informacij za delovanje Partnerjev Mreže Modro Poslovanje

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0397: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 October 2022.#HUMDA Magyar Autó-Motorsport Fejlesztési Ügynökség Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling – Harmonisation of fiscal legislation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Sales which are not subject to VAT – VAT unduly invoiced and paid – Liquidation of the provider – Refusal by the tax authority to refund to the customer VAT improperly paid – Principles of effectiveness, tax neutrality and non-discrimination.#Case C-397/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0399:           Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 8 septembre 2022.#IRnova AB contre FLIR Systems AB.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Compétence judiciaire, reconnaissance et exécution des décisions en matière civile et commerciale – Règlement (UE) no 1215/2012 – Article 24, point 4 – Compétences exclusives – Compétence en matière d’inscription ou de validité des brevets – Champ d’application – Demande de brevet déposée et brevet délivré dans un État tiers – Qualité d’inventeur – Titulaire du droit sur une invention.#Affaire C-399/21.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0401:           Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 14 juillet 2022.#Roumanie contre Commission européenne.#Pourvoi – Fonds de cohésion et Fonds européen de développement régional (FEDER) – Règlement (UE) no 1303/2013 – Taux de cofinancement applicable – Modification du taux intervenue entre la présentation de la dernière demande de paiement intermédiaire et l’approbation des comptes – Principes d’annualité comptable et de non-rétroactivité.#Affaire C-401/21 P.

This document does not exist in English.
0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0402: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 February 2023.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid and Others v S and Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EEC-Turkey Association Agreement – Decision No 1/80 – Articles 6 and 7 – Turkish nationals already integrated into the labour market of the host Member State and enjoying an associated right of residence – Decisions of national authorities withdrawing the right of residence of Turkish nationals who have been lawfully resident in the Member State concerned for more than 20 years on the ground that they constitute a present, genuine and sufficiently serious threat to a fundamental interest of society – Article 13 – Standstill clause – Article 14 – Justification – Grounds o

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0402_RES: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 February 2023.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid and Others v S and Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – EEC-Turkey Association Agreement – Decision No 1/80 – Articles 6 and 7 – Turkish nationals already integrated into the labour market of the host Member State and enjoying an associated right of residence – Decisions of national authorities withdrawing the right of residence of Turkish nationals who have been lawfully resident in the Member State concerned for more than 20 years on the ground that they constitute a present, genuine and sufficiently serious threat to a fundamental interest of society – Article 1

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0403: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 January 2023.#SC NV Construct SRL v Judeţul Timiş.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ – Criteria – Independence and compulsory nature of the jurisdiction of the national body concerned – Stability of the members of that body – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public procurement procedures – Article 58 – Selection criteria – Possibility of including, amongst those criteria, obligations under special laws applicable to the activities connected with the contract in question and not set out as a criterion for selection in the procurement documents – Article 63(1) – Tenderer relying on the capacities of another entity in order to meet the requirements of the contracting

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0403_SUM: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 January 2023.#SC NV Construct SRL v Judeţul Timiş.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiliul Naţional de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 267 TFEU – Definition of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ – Criteria – Independence and compulsory nature of the jurisdiction of the national body concerned – Stability of the members of that body – Directive 2014/24/EU – Public procurement procedures – Article 58 – Selection criteria – Possibility of including, amongst those criteria, obligations under special laws applicable to the activities connected with the contract in question and not set out as a criterion for selection in the procurement documents – Article 63(1) – Tenderer

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0404: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2022.#WP v Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale and Repubblica italiana.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Central Bank (ECB) staff members – Transfer of pension rights acquired in a national pension scheme to the ECB pension scheme – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – ECB Conditions of Employment – Article 8 of Annex IIIa – No provision of national law or agreement between the Member State concerned and the ECB.#Case C-404/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0405: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 October 2022.#FV v NOVA KREDITNA BANKA MARIBOR d.d.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Directive 93/13/EEC – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Article 3(1) and Article 8 – Criteria for assessing the unfairness of a contractual term – Significant imbalance between the parties’ rights and obligations under the contract – Requirement of good faith on the part of the seller or supplier – Possibility of ensuring a higher level of protection than that provided for in the directive.#Case C-405/21.

0 0

CELEX:62021CJ0406: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 20 October 2022.#A Oy v B Ky and C:n kuolinpesä.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Combating late payment in commercial transactions – Directive 2011/7/EU – Article 12(4) – Temporal scope – Practice established before 16 March 2013 consisting in not recovering interest for late payment or compensation for recovery costs – Practice applied to individual orders placed on or after that date – Article 7(2) and (3) – Grossly unfair contractual terms and practices – Waiver freely agreed to.#Case C-406/21.

RSS
First11831184118511861188119011911192Last

Poišči članke o davkih v bazi Modro poslovanje

Terms Of UsePrivacy StatementCopyright 2014-2014 by Srobotnik d.o.o.
Back To Top